I Never Believed in Things That I Couldn’t See*

There’s a certain fascination people sometimes have with ‘impossible’ mysteries. In many of those stories, the challenge is to figure out how anyone could have committed a murder when, for instance, no-one is seen leaving or coming in during the time the murder was committed. There are a lot of mysteries like that, which testifies to their appeal. This blog only has so much space so let me just mention a few.

Agatha Christie isn’t especially famous for ‘impossible’ mysteries, but she did write some of them. For example, in the novella Dead Man’s Mirror, Gervase Chevenix-Gore hires Hercule Poirot to find out who is stealing from him. Shortly after Poirot arrives at the family home Chevenix-Gore is killed in his study. The study window is locked, and so is the study door, so it looks very much like suicide. Poirot isn’t so sure of that, though, as little pieces of evidence suggest a murder. However, it’s hard to see how anyone could have got into the study, shot Chevenix-Gore and left again without anyone noticing. Little by little, Poirot uncovers the truth. You’re absolutely right, fans of Hercule Poirot’s Christmas.

If you like ‘impossible’ mysteries, you’ve probably read John Dickson Carr’s work (The Three Coffins and The Problem of the Wire Cage are two notable examples of his ‘impossible murders). But he’s hardly the only writer of the age to create that sort of mystery. Edmund Crispin’s The Moving Toyshop, for instance, sees Richard Codogan taking a holiday in Oxford. Late one night, he’s taking a walk and happens onto a toyshop with its lights still on. Out of curiosity, he goes inside. In an upstairs room, he finds the body of a woman just before being knocked unconscious. When he wakes, he’s locked in a closet. He gets out and summons the police, but by the time they get there the toyshop is gone, and a grocery store is in its place. Codogan knows what he saw, but as you can imagine, the police are not inclined to believe him. So, he asks his friend, Oxford don and amateur sleuth Gervase Fen, to investigate.

Slightly more recently, Hake Talbot’s Ring of the Pit takes place during a New England winter at a property called Cabrioun. Formerly owned by Grimaud Désanat, it’s now the property of his widow, Irene. Désanat and his business partner Luke Latham made a fortune in specialty wood furniture. However, the company relies on a particular type of wood that grows in only one place on the property now owned by Irene. She says that her husband had made her promise not to log the land for twenty years after his death. But, the company may run out of wood (and therefore, go out of business) without new logging. Irene, her daughter, Latham, and a few other people gather at Cabrioun to hold a séance so they can communicate with Désanat and get his permission to log the land. Shortly after the séance, Irene is murdered. There doesn’t seem a way that a killer could have got out of the room in which her body was found without being noticed. And there’s untouched snow outside; no-one could have, say, climbed up to the window from the outside and then escaped that way. It’s an odd mystery that challenges itinerant gambler and amateur sleuth Rogan Kincaid, who is one of the guests. Still, he puts the pieces of the puzzle together.

Keigo Higashino’s Malice is the story of famous author Kunihiko Hidaka. One night, his wife Rie and his friend Osamu Nonoguchi discover his body in the room where he writes. Immediately the police are called in and Inspector Kyoichiro Kaga begins the investigation. As you’d guess, his first suspects are the two people who found the body. However, home security footage shows that neither was in the house at the time of the murder, and both have provided solid alibis that hold up under scrutiny. Along with that, neither has an obvious motive. Now, Kaga is faced with a challenge: if neither of these two suspects killed Hidaka, then who did? How did that person get in and out again without leaving evidence? It’s a difficult case, and Kaga will have to delve into Hidaka’s past to find out the truth. You have a good point, fans of Salvation of a Saint.

And then there’s Tom Mead’s historical series featuring Joseph Spector. It’s the late 1930s, and Spector is a retired stage magician who’s turned amateur sleuth.  Because of Spector’s history, he’s very well acquainted with the ‘smoke and mirrors’ that killers can use to make a crime look impossible. That’s how, in Death and the Conjuror, he’s able to solve the murder of famous psychologist Anselm Rees, who’s found dead in his locked study. In The Murder Wheel, Spector finds out the truth about the murder of Domonic Dean, who was murdered while at the top of a Ferris wheel. His widow, Carla, was with him at the time, and seems to be the only one who could have killed him. But she swears she’s innocent. Her lawyer, Edmund Ibbs, will have a real challenge to defend her. And that turns out to be the least of his problems… He turns to Spector to help him find out the truth, and it turns out that this case is a real web of deception. Cabaret Macabre, the third Spector novels, comes out 16 July.

‘Impossible’ mysteries may be closely associated with the Golden Age, but they’re still popular, and authors are still writing them. They challenge thinking, and they can be absorbing. Do you like ‘impossible’ mysteries? Which have stayed with you?

*NOTE: the title of this post is a line from Russ Ballard’s You Can Do Magic.

 

 


14 thoughts on “I Never Believed in Things That I Couldn’t See*

  1. I have never been a fan of locked room mysteries or impossible mysteries, but it isn’t that I avoid them. I enjoy some mysteries that are described as impossible mysteries but more on the basis of the writing and the characters. Malice by Higashino is a perfect example of that. That is one of my favorite books by that author.

    Like

    1. I think Malice is an excellent book, Tracy. And I know what you mean about not being specifically a fan of a certain sub-genre. It’s the writing style and the characters that matter a lot more than the plot.

      Like

  2. I’m not a huge fan of impossible crimes if that’s the main or only focus, but if it’s combined with a more typical whodunit-style plot than it can add an extra element of mystery. That’s why John Dickson Carr works for me sometimes, but other times leaves me cold.

    Like

    1. I know what you mean FIctionFan. For me, anyway, the plot and characters come before untangling an ‘impossible’ mystery. That said, though, I’m not averse to matching wits with the author if the plot itself keeps me interested! And yes, Carr did that well at times. At other times….not so well.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. I am more partial towards closed circle mysteries than impossible crime ones. Of the books that you have mentioned, Malice is a great favourite. I remember being perplexed by Moving Toyshop. And I have forgotten everything about Dead Man’s Mirror. Perhaps time to reread them.

    Like

    1. Closed circle mysteries can be really appealing, Neeru, and they allow for some strong character development as well as the ‘whodunit’ aspect. I’m glad you enjoyed Malice; I think it’s an excellent book. Dead Man’s Mirror is, in my opinion, an interesting look at how the crime is committed, as well as what I’ll call hidden motive. If you re-read it, I hope you’ll enjoy it. As for The Moving Toyshop, I think it’s one of those books that really should be read more than once. I think Crispin wove a lot into it.

      Like

    1. Carr really did do some excellent, memorable ‘impossible’ mysteries, didn’t he, KBR? When they’re done well, it’s so engaging to match wits with the author and try to work out the howdunit as well as the whodunit. That’s the appeal for me, anyway. As you say, though, closed circle and country house mysteries can be top-notch, too. And you really do find a lot of well-done examples of all of these in GA crime fiction. Little wonder it’s called that!

      Liked by 1 person

  4. Mme Kinberg: As you know I have decried the veritable proliferation of locked room murders in the 1930’s. In my commentary in the blog of M. Selnes concerning Monsieur Joseph Spector and Inspector George Flint, the sleuths in Death and the Conjuror by Tom Mead, I described the number of locked room murders in London as an epidemic. I had thought, even expected, my thoughts would deter such murders. Mais non, M. Mead has written more! And now you find them absorbing! It is hopeless.

    Like

    1. Mon cher M. Poirot, I am desolated to hear that you were dissatisfied with this post on locked room and ‘impossible’ mysteries. It must be galling to you to see that M. Mead has not taken your advice to stop writing them, but what will you? People do as they do regardless of your counsel. Perhaps other posts on this blog or M. Selnes’ blog will be more to your liking.

      (Brilliant, Bill! Thank you!)

      Like

  5. I don’t think I’ve ever read an impossible mystery before although I have Malice on my kindle. I finished Big Swiss by Jen Beagin yesterday and was wondering whether to start Demon Copperhead, but now that you’ve mentioned Malice I’m in two minds lol.

    Like

What's your view?