Here’s an easy prediction: 2018 will bring mounting pressure to develop large-scale, automated responses to online misinformation. And here’s a hopeful one: That pressure will spark an increasingly frank discussion among journalists, policymakers, and platform companies about how to bolster the fact-building institutions that anchor public truth claims.
The quest to automate online fact-checking began well before the furor over so-called “fake news.” Fact-checks have a consistent structure built around discrete data elements — a claim, a claimant, a verdict — that lends itself to marrying human and machine intelligence in interesting ways. One of the first attempts to do this was Truth Goggles, an MIT project that (as initially conceived in 2011) tried to harness the work of professional fact-checkers to build a “magical button” that would instantly flag false claims on any web page.
Since then, fact-checkers and computer scientists have worked together on a string of projects that aim to automate different part of the fact-checking process. One thing these efforts have in common is using automation as an enhancement, rather than a replacement, for journalistic work — as what Bill Adair, writing in these pages past year, called a “force multiplier” to help human fact-checkers keep up with a growing tide of online misinformation.
For example, the most tedious part of a fact-checker’s job is hunting for interesting and important claims to check; a lot of what politicians say in speeches and debates turns out to be vague rhetoric or statements of opinion. ClaimBuster, developed by computer scientists at the University of Texas at Arlington, pores over transcripts to identify and rank factual statements that fact-checkers might want to investigate. (It also retweets checkable claims here.)
Another promising tool, being developed by the U.K.-based Full Fact, scans media feeds to track which politicians and news outlets are repeating claims that have already been debunked. Called Trends, the project is designed to give the fact-checkers a strategic view of the misinformation landscape, so they can target their corrections more effectively. Political journalists will also be able to use it to guide their reporting.
The most powerful automation technology deployed so far is in some ways the simplest: Since 2016, growing numbers of fact-checkers around the world have been using a new tagging scheme, called ClaimReview, that makes their work legible to algorithms. This means that when Google recognizes the claim being searched for — try “the Russia investigation is a made-up story” — it can preview the verdict in a “snippet” at the top of the search results. (The same tagging system lets the Amazon Echo look up answers to factual queries.)
The research involved in efforts like these has started to bring into view the “holy grail” of an end-to-end fact-checking engine that can check at least some kinds of claims in real time. ClaimBuster and Full Fact have trials in the works (see videos here and here) which operate by matching new claims against fact-checkers’ databases — or, in certain cases, by consulting original data sources such as economic statistics or voting records. As Full Fact noted in a 2016 report, the key to these efforts “is to make sure the kinds of resources fact-checkers can rely on are available as structured data that computers can use.”
And that’s what’s most exciting about these initiatives: Designing the systems to automate verification will draw focus back to the public, institutionally sanctioned data sources that human fact-checkers depend on to certify facts about everything from hurricane strength to inflation rates. These include agencies at every level of government — the U.K.’s Office of National Statistics is an ideal-typical example — as well as countless scientific and civil institutions that set standards and produce benchmark data in different areas of research or policy.
Political fact-checkers couldn’t do what they do without these kinds of institutional resources. Of course, neither could Google’s search algorithms, which depend both directly and indirectly on institutional authority reflected in our patterns of clicking and linking online. In fact, professional fact-checking groups act as a kind of social engine — one of many — for translating institutional knowledge into data that computers can work with.
Reflections on the rise of “algorithmic authority” have tended to oppose it to the institutional kind, based on old-world mechanisms like formal credentialing and peer review. The push for “automated” fact-checking may help us to come to terms with a reality that has always been messier than that, making explicit the institutional subsidy that algorithmic intelligence depends on.
Lucas Graves is senior research fellow at the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism and an assistant professor at the University of Wisconsin.
Millie Tran and Stine Bauer Dahlberg (Hint: It’s about your brand)
Ernst-Jan Pfauth Publishing less to give readers more
Sydette Harry Listen to your corner and watch for the hook
Miguel Castro The arrival of the impact producer
Corey Ford The empire strikes back
Damon Krukowski Reviving the alt-weekly soul
Amy King Let’s amplify visual voice
Alice Antheaume Are you fluent in AI?
Ståle Grut Reclaiming audience interaction from social networks
P. Kim Bui The reckoning is only beginning
Rachel Schallom Better design helps differentiate opinion and news
Betsy O'Donovan and Melody Kramer Skepticism and narcissism
Edward Roussel Eyes, ears, and brains
Yvonne Leow The rise of video messaging
Justin Kosslyn The year journalists become digital security experts
Alastair Coote The year of self-improvement
Alexios Mantzarlis Moving fake news research out of the lab
Raney Aronson-Rath Transparency is the antidote to fake news
Sally Lehrman Trust comes first
Caitria O'Neill The new court of public opinion
Federica Cherubini The rise of bridge roles in news organizations
Jacqui Cheng Retailers move into content
Julia Beizer A longer view on the pivot
Rubina Madan Fillion Unlocking the potential of AI
Hossein Derakhshan Television has won
Carlos Martínez de la Serna The new journalism commons
Craig Newmark Working together toward sustainable solutions
Sara M. Watson Feeds will open up to new user-determined filters
Imaeyen Ibanga Longform video leads the way
José Zamora Revenue-first journalism
Lucas Graves From algorithms to institutions
Taylor Lorenz Social and media will split
Tanya Cordrey Finally, the seeds of radical reinvention
AX Mina Memes and visuals come to the fore
Trushar Barot The Jio-fication of India
Matt Carlson Attacks on the press will get worse
Kristen Muller The year of the voter
Carrie Brown-Smith Transparency finally takes off
Claire Wardle Disinformation gets worse
Jennifer Choi Standing up for us and for each other
Evie Nagy Pivot to mobile video frustration
Laura E. Davis Writing answers before you know the question
Basile Simon We need better career paths for news nerds
Frédéric Filloux External forces
Marcela Donini and Thiago Herdy Collaboration is the way forward for Brazilian journalism
Amie Ferris-Rotman More female reporters abroad (please)
Matt DeRienzo A recession, then a collapse
Adam Thomas Sharing is caring: The year of the mentor
Debra Adams Simmons And a woman shall lead them
Jarrod Dicker Honesty in advertising
Amy Webb Listen to weak signals
Matt Thompson Here come the attention managers
Heather Bryant Building the ecosystems for collaboration
Umbreen Bhatti The trust problem isn’t new
Alfred Hermida Going beyond mobile-first
Emily Goligoski Looking beyond news for inspiration
Mario García Storytelling finally adapts to mobile
Eric Nuzum Beyond the narrative arc
Sam Sanders Shine the light on ourselves
Bill Keller A growing turn to philanthropy
Jared Newman Venture funding and digital news don’t mix
Matt Boggie The intellectual equivalent of the Dead Sea
Doris Truong Computer vision vs. the Internet vigilantes
Feli Sánchez The year for guerrilla user research
Manoush Zomorodi Self-help as a publishing strategy
Lam Thuy Vo Breaking free from the tyranny of the loudest
Mike Caulfield Refactoring media literacy for the networked age
Mira Lowe The year of the local watchdog
Kim Fox Audience teams diversify their approach
Luke O'Neil The end is already here
Jennifer Brandel and Mónica Guzmán The editorial meeting of the future
Dan Shanoff You down with OTT? (Yeah, DTC)
Sam Ford The year of investing in processes
Brian Lam Sketchy ethics around product reviews
Ruth Palmer Risks will grow for news subjects — especially minorities
Steve Grove The midterms are an opportunity
Mary Meehan Real lives are at stake in rural areas
Alan Soon The rise of start of psychographic, micro-targeted media
Caitlin Thompson Podcasting models mature and diversify
Nushin Rashidian Publishers seek ad dollar alternatives
Eric Ulken The year local publishers get smart(er) about change
Juliette De Maeyer A responsible press criticism
Mary Walter-Brown Show a little vulnerability
Jennifer Coogan The future is female
Rodney Gibbs Tech workers turn to journalism
Jesse Holcomb Information disorder, coming to a congressional district near you
Vivian Schiller Pivot to tomorrow
Pablo Boczkowski The rise of skeptical reading
Niketa Patel Live journalism comes of age
Nicholas Quah Stop talking trash about young people
Kawandeep Virdee Zines had it right all along
Corey Johnson The pro-fact resistance
Borja Echevarría TV goes digital, digital goes TV
Pia Frey Address users as individuals
Daniel Trielli The rich get richer, the poor scramble
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen The Snapchat scenario and the risk of more closed platforms
Zizi Papacharissi Women come back
Tamar Charney We get serious about algorithms
Kyle Ellis Let’s build our way out of this
Marie Gilot No assholes allowed
Julia B. Chan Looking for loyalty in all the right places
Sarah Marshall Loyalty as the key performance indicator
Joanne Lipman Journalists inventing revenue streams
Tim Carmody Watch out for Spotify
Kathleen McElroy Building a news video experience native to mobile
Andrew Ramsammy The year ownership mattered
Mariano Blejman News games rule
Pete Brown Push alerts, personalized
Tanzina Vega It’s time for media companies to #PassTheMic
Tracie Powell The muting of underserved voices
David Skok Finding an information-life balance
Monique Judge Letting black women tell their own stories
Aron Pilhofer We can’t leave the business to the business side any more
Mariana Moura Santos Think local, act global
Joyce Barnathan It will be harder to bury the news
Nikki Usher The year of The Washington Post
Rodney Benson Better, less read, and less trusted
Francesco Marconi The year of machine-to-machine journalism
Michelle Garcia Navigating journalistic transparency
Jessica Parker Gilbert Design connects storytelling and strategy
Jim Moroney Newspapers have to be good enough for readers to pay for
Hannah Cassius The year of the echo-chamber escapists
Richard Tofel The platforms’ power demands more reporters’ attention
Will Sommer The year local media gets conservative
Joanne McNeil Gatekeeping the gatekeepers
Renée Kaplan The year of quiet adjustments (shhh)
Lanre Akinola Making noise is not a strategy
Felix Salmon Covering bitcoin while owning bitcoin
Andrew Losowsky The year of resilience
Jim Brady With the people, not just of the people
Nicholas Diakopoulos Fortifying social media from automated inauthenticity
Jamie Mottram From pageviews to t-shirts
Andrew Haeg The year journalists become relationship builders
Elizabeth Jensen Show your work
Susie Banikarim R.I.P. Pivot to Video (2017–2017)
Errin Haines At the ballot, it’s time to count black women
Cristina Wilson The year of the Instagram Story
Juleyka Lantigua Women of color will reclaim and monetize our time
Dheerja Kaur Fun with subscription products
Vanessa K. DeLuca Women’s voices take center stage
Raju Narisetti Mirror, mirror on the wall
Molly de Aguiar Good journalism won’t be enough
C.W. Anderson The social media apocalypse
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Seeking trust in fragmented spaces
Rick Berke Value is the watchword
Michael Kuntz The only pivot that might work
Christopher Meighan Passive partnership is in the rearview
Cory Haik Suffering from realness, pivoting to impact
Emma Carew Grovum Newsroom culture becomes a priority
S. Mitra Kalita The arc of news and audience
Mi-Ai Parrish Blockchain and trust
Mandy Velez texting is lit rn, fam
Dannagal G. Young Stop covering politics as a game
Kinsey Wilson Facebook and Google: Help out or pay up
Rachel Davis Mersey AI, with real smarts
Monika Bauerlein The firehose of falsehood
Charo Henríquez Training is an investment, not an expense
Michelle Ferrier The year of the great reckoning
Cindy Royal Your journalism curriculum is obsolete
Helen Havlak Keywords, not publishers, power the world’s biggest feeds