How well has Rwanda healed 25 years after the genocide?
Not well enough, apparently, for President Paul Kagame to ease his grip
TWENTY-FIVE YEARS after the genocide, Rwanda is still an enigma. Its recovery in economic, social and psychological terms is hotly debated. Almost every aspect of the past and present is still argued over. What exactly caused the genocide (which started after a plane carrying Rwanda’s president, Juvénal Habyarimana, was shot down by unknown assassins)? How many people died? Could outsiders, in particular the UN, have halted it?
More recently, has President Paul Kagame, the Tutsi rebel commander who stopped the genocide at gunpoint and has ruled ever since, genuinely sought to heal the wounds? Or does he cynically exploit the horror to legitimise his ruthlessly authoritarian and predominantly Tutsi regime? Are the Hutus, still a large majority, quietly determined to take over again one day? Could democracy ever take root in Rwanda—or is a firm grip on government the least bad option?
This article appeared in the Middle East & Africa section of the print edition under the headline "We’re just one happy family now, aren’t we?"
More from Middle East & Africa
The Middle East has a militia problem
More than a quarter of the region’s 400m people live in states dominated by armed groups
How much do Palestinians pay to get out of Gaza?
Middlemen are profiting from Gazans’ desperation
Why Iranian dissidents love Cyrus, an ancient Persian king
The British Museum is sending one of Iran’s adored antiquities to Israel