I fear 2018 will be the year we will see a major platform decide that news is simply not worth the trouble and move to (1) reduce the role of news and systematically separate it from other content and (2) reduce the number of news organizations allowed to publish to the platform, strictly controlling who has the opportunity.
We can call this the “Snapchat scenario,” as that is basically how news works on Snapchat. Some platforms in mainland China, Japan, and South Korea also control news distribution tightly and are only open to preapproved select partners.
Relatively open platforms like Facebook or YouTube could choose to adopt this model, for any mix of three possible reasons rooted in politics, users, or advertising—
For those who see the relationship between platforms and publishers as a zero-sum game, having a platform like Facebook or YouTube stepping away from news might seem like a win.
It would almost certainly be a win for the “platform darlings” who would be allowed to continue to publish to the platform. (Past experience suggests these select partners would be (a) few, (b) primarily English-language brands with international reach, and (c) mostly but not exclusively up-market.)
But what would it be like for the literally tens of thousands of publishers all over the world who are not “platform darlings” and do not have the scale or exclusivity to be attractive partners? The large drops in referrals to publishers when Facebook experimented with a Snapchat-like separation between private posts from individuals and public posts from pages in a number of countries in the fall of 2017 suggest not.
The reason the Snapchat scenario worries me is that — while it is clear that major platforms like Facebook and YouTube have been misused to spread disinformation, misinformation, and hate speech, both by for-profit actors and political actors, and have to confront serious issues concerning the quality, intelligibility, and algorithmic filtering of content — they also have some very real positive implications that might well be imperiled if news content was much more restricted. They include:
It is clear that large platforms like Facebook and YouTube have system-wide implications in terms of their dominant role in drawing attention, collecting data, and attracting advertising, and that, by enabling lots of different actors and activities, they have also become platforms for many troubling things and have sometimes failed to check these.
But these relatively permissive and often rambunctious environments also have demonstrably positive implications for our democracies. It is not inherently wrong that Snapchat and some other platforms take a far more restrictive approach to news. But do we want the biggest platforms to do the same?
Most platforms would want to continue to let their users “organically” share things they are interested in. But the example of Snapchat — and many increasingly popular messaging apps — suggest they can simultaneously decide to design their products in ways that limit both the role of news overall and news organizations’ ability to freely publish to the platform.
This is the Snapchat-scenario future we may face, but in my view not one we should aspire to. A central challenge going forward is how the positive effects outlined can be retained while also confronting some of the very real problems associated with the rise of platforms. How do we, as societies, deal with this? Paraphrasing James Madison’s stance on the rambunctious and often wildly inaccurate and partisan press of the early American republic, we might say that some degree of abuse is inseparable from the proper use of everything, and in no instance is this more true than in that of open platforms. I hope efforts to combat such abuse won’t involve systematically reducing and restricting the role of news.
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen is director of research at the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism at Oxford University.
Felix Salmon Covering bitcoin while owning bitcoin
Andrew Losowsky The year of resilience
Nikki Usher The year of The Washington Post
Monika Bauerlein The firehose of falsehood
Corey Ford The empire strikes back
Jessica Parker Gilbert Design connects storytelling and strategy
Corey Johnson The pro-fact resistance
Ernst-Jan Pfauth Publishing less to give readers more
Julia B. Chan Looking for loyalty in all the right places
Michael Kuntz The only pivot that might work
David Skok Finding an information-life balance
Dannagal G. Young Stop covering politics as a game
Alice Antheaume Are you fluent in AI?
Cindy Royal Your journalism curriculum is obsolete
Ruth Palmer Risks will grow for news subjects — especially minorities
José Zamora Revenue-first journalism
Jennifer Brandel and Mónica Guzmán The editorial meeting of the future
Laura E. Davis Writing answers before you know the question
Joanne McNeil Gatekeeping the gatekeepers
Alan Soon The rise of start of psychographic, micro-targeted media
Miguel Castro The arrival of the impact producer
Amy Webb Listen to weak signals
Eric Nuzum Beyond the narrative arc
Carlos Martínez de la Serna The new journalism commons
Raney Aronson-Rath Transparency is the antidote to fake news
Mary Meehan Real lives are at stake in rural areas
Imaeyen Ibanga Longform video leads the way
Claire Wardle Disinformation gets worse
Doris Truong Computer vision vs. the Internet vigilantes
Mike Caulfield Refactoring media literacy for the networked age
Mandy Velez texting is lit rn, fam
Lucas Graves From algorithms to institutions
Kinsey Wilson Facebook and Google: Help out or pay up
Ståle Grut Reclaiming audience interaction from social networks
AX Mina Memes and visuals come to the fore
Rachel Schallom Better design helps differentiate opinion and news
Alastair Coote The year of self-improvement
Matt Boggie The intellectual equivalent of the Dead Sea
Mariano Blejman News games rule
Betsy O'Donovan and Melody Kramer Skepticism and narcissism
Manoush Zomorodi Self-help as a publishing strategy
Basile Simon We need better career paths for news nerds
Charo Henríquez Training is an investment, not an expense
Craig Newmark Working together toward sustainable solutions
Matt DeRienzo A recession, then a collapse
Rodney Gibbs Tech workers turn to journalism
Rick Berke Value is the watchword
Gordon Crovitz Serving readers over advertisers
Taylor Lorenz Social and media will split
Vivian Schiller Pivot to tomorrow
Pia Frey Address users as individuals
Christopher Meighan Passive partnership is in the rearview
Sam Ford The year of investing in processes
Dan Shanoff You down with OTT? (Yeah, DTC)
Jesse Holcomb Information disorder, coming to a congressional district near you
Jim Moroney Newspapers have to be good enough for readers to pay for
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Seeking trust in fragmented spaces
Hannah Cassius The year of the echo-chamber escapists
Damon Krukowski Reviving the alt-weekly soul
Andrew Haeg The year journalists become relationship builders
Kyle Ellis Let’s build our way out of this
Cory Haik Suffering from realness, pivoting to impact
Brian Lam Sketchy ethics around product reviews
Yvonne Leow The rise of video messaging
Federica Cherubini The rise of bridge roles in news organizations
Juleyka Lantigua Women of color will reclaim and monetize our time
Lanre Akinola Making noise is not a strategy
Sarah Marshall Loyalty as the key performance indicator
Adam Thomas Sharing is caring: The year of the mentor
Michelle Garcia Navigating journalistic transparency
Nicholas Diakopoulos Fortifying social media from automated inauthenticity
Mariana Moura Santos Think local, act global
Julia Beizer A longer view on the pivot
Juliette De Maeyer A responsible press criticism
Evie Nagy Pivot to mobile video frustration
Nicholas Quah Stop talking trash about young people
P. Kim Bui The reckoning is only beginning
Molly de Aguiar Good journalism won’t be enough
Frédéric Filloux External forces
Renée Kaplan The year of quiet adjustments (shhh)
Richard Tofel The platforms’ power demands more reporters’ attention
Amy King Let’s amplify visual voice
Marcela Donini and Thiago Herdy Collaboration is the way forward for Brazilian journalism
Alexios Mantzarlis Moving fake news research out of the lab
Ray Soto VR reaches the next level
Sally Lehrman Trust comes first
C.W. Anderson The social media apocalypse
Bill Keller A growing turn to philanthropy
Michelle Ferrier The year of the great reckoning
Amie Ferris-Rotman More female reporters abroad (please)
Edward Roussel Eyes, ears, and brains
Niketa Patel Live journalism comes of age
Monique Judge Letting black women tell their own stories
Emily Goligoski Looking beyond news for inspiration
Francesco Marconi The year of machine-to-machine journalism
Emma Carew Grovum Newsroom culture becomes a priority
Kawandeep Virdee Zines had it right all along
Joanne Lipman Journalists inventing revenue streams
Jarrod Dicker Honesty in advertising
Steve Grove The midterms are an opportunity
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen The Snapchat scenario and the risk of more closed platforms
Matt Thompson Here come the attention managers
Susie Banikarim R.I.P. Pivot to Video (2017–2017)
Alfred Hermida Going beyond mobile-first
Jennifer Choi Standing up for us and for each other
Rodney Benson Better, less read, and less trusted
Mary Walter-Brown Show a little vulnerability
Eric Ulken The year local publishers get smart(er) about change
Tracie Powell The muting of underserved voices
Daniel Trielli The rich get richer, the poor scramble
Tamar Charney We get serious about algorithms
Mi-Ai Parrish Blockchain and trust
Pablo Boczkowski The rise of skeptical reading
Feli Sánchez The year for guerrilla user research
Jared Newman Venture funding and digital news don’t mix
Raju Narisetti Mirror, mirror on the wall
Caitria O'Neill The new court of public opinion
Carrie Brown-Smith Transparency finally takes off
Rachel Davis Mersey AI, with real smarts
Borja Echevarría TV goes digital, digital goes TV
Justin Kosslyn The year journalists become digital security experts
Hossein Derakhshan Television has won
Zizi Papacharissi Women come back
Debra Adams Simmons And a woman shall lead them
Matt Carlson Attacks on the press will get worse
Jassim Ahmad Thriving on change
Jacqui Cheng Retailers move into content
Jamie Mottram From pageviews to t-shirts
Andrew Ramsammy The year ownership mattered
Marie Gilot No assholes allowed
Jim Brady With the people, not just of the people
Errin Haines At the ballot, it’s time to count black women
Joyce Barnathan It will be harder to bury the news
Tanya Cordrey Finally, the seeds of radical reinvention
Kim Fox Audience teams diversify their approach
Vanessa K. DeLuca Women’s voices take center stage
Pete Brown Push alerts, personalized
Tanzina Vega It’s time for media companies to #PassTheMic
Helen Havlak Keywords, not publishers, power the world’s biggest feeds
Lam Thuy Vo Breaking free from the tyranny of the loudest
Nushin Rashidian Publishers seek ad dollar alternatives
Trushar Barot The Jio-fication of India
Sydette Harry Listen to your corner and watch for the hook
Aron Pilhofer We can’t leave the business to the business side any more
Dheerja Kaur Fun with subscription products
Rubina Madan Fillion Unlocking the potential of AI
Sam Sanders Shine the light on ourselves
S. Mitra Kalita The arc of news and audience
Millie Tran and Stine Bauer Dahlberg (Hint: It’s about your brand)
Umbreen Bhatti The trust problem isn’t new
Kristen Muller The year of the voter
Kathleen McElroy Building a news video experience native to mobile
Sara M. Watson Feeds will open up to new user-determined filters
Mario García Storytelling finally adapts to mobile
Will Sommer The year local media gets conservative
Caitlin Thompson Podcasting models mature and diversify
Luke O'Neil The end is already here
Heather Bryant Building the ecosystems for collaboration
Tim Carmody Watch out for Spotify