Attitudes Toward Advocacy Do Not Match Actions: A Cross-sectional Survey of Residents and Fellows

R I Med J (2013). 2019 Apr 1;102(3):34-37.

Abstract

Background/objective: We sought to determine baseline physician advocacy knowledge and attitudes of resident and fellow trainees at our institution to inform future graduate medical education (GME) activities.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was developed and administered to all house staff in 2014 at Lifespan Hospitals, affiliated with The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University.

Results: The response rate was 24% (134/558). Eighty-eight percent reported voting in the 2012 presidential election, with lower participation in regional elections. Less than 25% felt comfortable explaining the Affordable Care Act, communicating with media, or influencing legislation on a health care issue. The majority (94%) agreed that "as a physician I have a duty to advocate." Few reported receiving adequate advocacy training in medical school (18%) or residency (12%).

Conclusions: House staff agreed that physicians have a duty to advocate, but this did not translate into knowledge or action. GME should increase curricular efforts for trainees in the health care advocacy domain.

Keywords: advocacy training; graduate medical education; physician advocacy.

MeSH terms

  • Attitude of Health Personnel*
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Curriculum
  • Education, Medical, Graduate*
  • Female
  • Health Care Reform
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice*
  • Health Policy
  • Humans
  • Internship and Residency / statistics & numerical data*
  • Male
  • Patient Advocacy*
  • Politics
  • Rhode Island
  • Surveys and Questionnaires