Bank supervision in America is unfit for the digital age
Complexity favours incumbents, large and small, over startups
HERE COME the Germans. On May 21st Raisin, a “deposit marketplace” from Berlin, declared its intention to set up shop in America. Within a year Raisin hopes to follow its compatriot, N26, a mobile bank that is due to open there soon. Yet neither will, technically, be a bank. Remarkably, no such startup yet has a national banking charter in America, although the country is a hotbed of financial technology, spawning innovators from PayPal to Quicken Loans.
Both Raisin and N26 will rely, at least at first, on the charters and deposit insurance of local “sponsor” banks. That route is “fastest to market”, says Nicolas Kopp of N26. It is also common. Sponsors such as the Bancorp Bank, Cross River Bank and WebBank stand behind fintechs and others wanting to offer banking services. (They often supply technology, too.)
This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline "Trouble logging in"
Finance & economics June 1st 2019
- Have regulators created a new type of financial monster?
- Will the trade war spell the end of Chinese stock listings in America?
- Jokowi wants to improve the quality of Indonesia’s labour force
- Facebook’s planned new currency may be based on a blockchain
- Bank supervision in America is unfit for the digital age
- China cannot easily weaponise its holdings of American government debt
More from Finance & economics
The property firm that could break China’s back
If Vanke collapses, so might confidence in the state’s management of the economy
Narendra Modi’s flagship growth scheme is off to a sluggish start
Without improvements, it risks wasting trillions of rupees
Diego Maradona offers central bankers enduring lessons
Recent years ought to have reduced the importance of a skilful feint. They have not