Eight years ago, Germany required comparisons between all newly introduced drugs and existing options, such as the standard of care, to gauge their benefit as a basis for price negotiations. But a new analysis finds that between 2011 and 2017, only a minority of new medicines offered a meaningful benefit, leading analysts to ask: “Where did we go wrong?”
The law emerged in the face of rising drug prices, a problem that has only accelerated in the intervening years. This prompted officials at the the independent agency that assesses clinical evidence — the Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care, or IQWiG — to explore whether the approach was actually leading to greater value.
What they found disturbed them.
About the Author Reprints
To submit a correction request, please visit our Contact Us page.
STAT encourages you to share your voice. We welcome your commentary, criticism, and expertise on our subscriber-only platform, STAT+ Connect