Biden's INSANE Proposed Capital Gains Tax Would WRECK Economy
J.K. Rowling Takes Victory Lap and Applauds David Bell, Tavistock Gender Clinic Whistleblo...
You Don't Despise the Media Enough: CNN Omits MAJOR Bit of Info on...
Speaker Johnson Takes Charge of Academia's Radicalism Problem
Biden WH Taking Aim at Trump's 'The Apprentice' Catch Phrase Blows Up in...
'Simmer Down Commie': Bernie Sanders Tries Lecturing Netanyahu and It BACKFIRES Big Time
Ilhan Omar Visits Columbia Shakes Hands With Student Leader Who Said 'Zionists Don't...
WH Staffers Made New Strategy to Flank Biden While He Walks a Little...
Elon Musk NAILS the Problem Facing Western Civilization: 'Weak Makes Right'
What Will SCOTUS Do With the ATF's Rule on Unfinished Frames and Receivers?
University of Florida ENDS Pro-Hamas Camps With a Few Very Simple Rules ......
Biden Answered Howard Stern's Question About Debating Trump ('His Handlers Must Be Furious...
Biden Told Howard Stern About Women Mailing Him 'Very Salacious Pictures' (and Other...
WOOF! First Joke/Story of The Onion's Ben Collins Era Drops and It's Even...
California Mayor Attacked on Camera During Interview Promoting His City

Dream on: Washington Post runs piece on getting rid of Justice Brett Kavanaugh without impeaching him

Even before Sen. Dianne Feinstein dropped that letter she’d been sitting on for six weeks, there were plenty of wishful thinking articles and tweets about how even if Judge Brett Kavanaugh were confirmed, he could be impeached after he was seated.

Advertisement

Kavanaugh has been seated, but the anti-Kavanaugh faction isn’t giving up yet. In the Washington Post Wednesday, University of Chicago law professor Aziz Huq argued that there are two ways to remove Kavanaugh from the Supreme Court that don’t rely on impeachment.

In short, here they are:

In the first, a new president would nominate and the Senate would confirm by majority vote a justice — in this case Kavanaugh — to a different post on an intermediate court of appeals (say the D.C. Circuit, where Kavanaugh formerly served). The justice would, in effect, be demoted.

That brings us to the second alternative method of relieving a justice of his or her duties. In a 2006 article in the Yale Law Journal, two scholars (conservatives, as it happens), Saikrishna Prakash and Steven D. Smith, amassed historical evidence that the Framers understood the “good behavior” standard to be judicially, rather than just politically, enforceable.

Little good has come from the Kavanaugh confirmation process. But Kavanaugh opponents have a rare chance to push for a positive institutional change as they press their immediate agenda. If the political stars align, something good for our constitutional democracy might result from their efforts: a better way to discipline errant federal judges.

Advertisement

Discipline Kavanaugh for what, exactly?

Advertisement


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement