Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Adjunct botox to preoperative progressive pneumoperitoneum for incisional hernia with loss of domain: no additional effect but may improve outcomes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Incisional hernia with loss of domain (IHLD) remains a surgical challenge. Its management requires complex approaches including specific preoperative and intra-operative techniques. This study focuses on the interest of adding preoperative botulinum toxin A (BTA) injection to preoperative progressive pneumoperitoneum (PPP), compared to PPP alone.

Material

Patients between January 2015 and March 2020 with IHLD who underwent pre-operative preparation were included. Their baseline characteristics were retrospectively analyzed, along with the characteristics of their incisional hernia before and after preparation including CT-scan volumetry. Intra-operative data, early post-operative outcomes, surgical site occurrences (SSOs) including surgical site infection (SSI) were recorded.

Results

Four hundred and fifty (450) patients with incisional hernia were operated, including 41 patients (9.1%) with IHLD, 13 of which had both BTA and PPP, while 28 had PPP only. Both groups were comparable in term of patients and IHLD characteristics. Median increase in the volume of the abdominal cavity (VAbC) was + 55% for the entire population (+ 58.3% for the BTA-PPP group, p < 0.0001 and + 52.8% for the PPP-alone group, p < 0.0001) although the increase in volume was not different between the two groups (p = 0.99). Complete fascial closure was achieved in all patients. SSOs were more frequent in the PPP-alone group than in the BTA-PPP group (17 (60.7%) versus 3 (23.1%) patients, respectively, p = 0.043).

Conclusion

BTA and PPP are both useful in pre-operative preparation for IHLD. Combining both significantly increases the volume of abdominal cavity but associating BTA to PPP does not add any volumetric benefit but may decrease the post-operative SSO rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

All data, materials and software application comply with field standards.

References

  1. Fink C, Baumann P, Wente MN et al (2014) Incisional hernia rate 3 years after midline laparotomy. Br J Surg 101:51–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lavanchy JL, Buff SE, Kohler A et al (2019) Long-term results of laparoscopic versus open intraperitonealonlay mesh incisional hernia repair: a propensity score-matched analysis. SurgEndosc 33:225–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6298-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bosanquet DC, Ansell J, Abdelrahman T et al (2015) Systematic review and meta-regression of factors affecting midline incisional Hernia rates: analysis of 14,618 patients. PLoS ONE 10:e0138745. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138745

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kanitra JJ, Hess AL, Haan PS et al (2019) Hernia recurrence and infection rate in elective complex abdominal wall repair using biologic mesh. BMC Surg. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-019-0640-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Kokotovic D, Bisgaard T, Helgstrand F (2016) Long-term recurrence and complications associated with elective incisional Hernia repair. JAMA 316:1575–1582. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.15217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Christoffersen MW, Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J et al (2013) Lower reoperation rate for recurrence after mesh versus sutured elective repair in small umbilical and epigastric hernias. a nationwide register study. World J Surg 37:2548–2552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2160-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Slater NJ, Montgomery A, Berrevoet F et al (2014) Criteria for definition of a complex abdominal wall hernia. Hernia 18:7–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-013-1168-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Passot G, Villeneuve L, Sabbagh C et al (2016) Definition of giant ventral hernias: development of standardization through a practice survey. Int J Surg 28:136–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.01.097

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lipman J, Medalie D, Rosen MJ (2008) Staged repair of massive incisional hernias with loss of abdominal domain: a novel approach. Am J Surg 195:84–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.02.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Eriksson A, Rosenberg J, Bisgaard T (2014) Surgical treatment for giant incisional hernia: a qualitative systematic review. Hernia 18:31–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-013-1066-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Oliver-Allen HS, Hunter C, Lee GK (2015) Abdominal compartment syndrome as a rare complication following component separation repair: case report and review of the literature. Hernia 19:293–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-015-1362-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mavrodin CI, Pariza G, Ion D, Antoniac VI (2013) Abdominal compartment syndrome—a major complication of large incisional hernia surgery. Chirurgia (Bucur) 108:414–417

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Angelici AM, Perotti B, Dezzi C et al (2016) Measurement of intra-abdominal pressure in large incisional hernia repair to prevent abdominal compartmental syndrome. G Chir 37:31–36

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. The Pediatric Guidelines Sub-Committee for the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome, Kirkpatrick AW, Roberts DJ et al (2013) Intra-abdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome: updated consensus definitions and clinical practice guidelines from the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. Intensive Care Med 39:1190–1206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-013-2906-z

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Renard Y, Lardière-Deguelte S, de Mestier L et al (2016) Management of large incisional hernias with loss of domain: a prospective series of patients prepared by progressive preoperative pneumoperitoneum. Surgery 160:426–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2016.03.033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ramirez OM, Ruas E, Dellon AL (1990) “Components separation” method for closure of abdominal-wall defects: an anatomic and clinical study. PlastReconstrSurg 86:519–526. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199009000-00023

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ramirez OM (2006) Inception and evolution of the components separation technique: personal recollections. ClinPlastSurg 33(241–246):vi. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2005.12.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Carbonell AM, Cobb WS, Chen SM (2008) Posterior components separation during retromuscular hernia repair. Hernia 12:359–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-008-0356-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Novitsky YW, Elliott HL, Orenstein SB, Rosen MJ (2012) Transversusabdominis muscle release: a novel approach to posterior component separation during complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Am J Surg 204:709–716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.02.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Blair LJ, Ross SW, Huntington CR et al (2015) Computed tomographic measurements predict component separation in ventral hernia repair. J Surg Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2015.06.033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zolin SJ, Fafaj A, Krpata DM (2020) Transversusabdominis release (TAR): what are the real indications and where is the limit? Hernia 24:333–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02150-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hodgkinson JD, Leo CA, Maeda Y et al (2018) A meta-analysis comparing open anterior component separation with posterior component separation and transversusabdominis release in the repair of midline ventral hernias. Hernia 22:617–626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1757-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Petro CC, Raigani S, Fayezizadeh M et al (2015) Permissible intraabdominal hypertension following complex abdominal wall reconstruction. PlastReconstrSurg 136:868–881. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001621

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hadad I, Small W, Dumanian GA (2009) Repair of massive ventral hernias with the separation of parts technique: reversal of the “lost domain.” Am Surg 75:301–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Qaja E, Le C, Benedicto R (2017) Repair of giant inguinoscrotal hernia with loss of domain. J Surg Case Rep. https://doi.org/10.1093/jscr/rjx221

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Benoit O, Moszkowicz D, Milot L et al (2020) Right colectomy with absorbable mesh repair as a salvage solution for the management of giant incisional hernia with loss of domain: results of a bicentric study. World J Surg 44:1762–1770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05395-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Alam NN, Narang SK, Pathak S et al (2016) Methods of abdominal wall expansion for repair of incisional herniae: a systematic review. Hernia 20:191–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-016-1463-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Goñi Moreno I (1971) Pneumoperitoneum applied to the surgical preparation of large chronic eventrations. Prensa Med Argent 58:1037–1041

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Moreno IG (1947) Chronic eventrations and large hernias; preoperative treatment by progressive pneumoperitomeum; original procedure. Surgery 22:945–953

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Dumont F, Fuks D, Verhaeghe P et al (2009) Progressive pneumoperitoneum increases the length of abdominal muscles. Hernia 13:183–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-008-0436-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. LópezSanclemente MC, Robres J, López Cano M et al (2013) Progressive preoperative pneumoperitoneum in patients with giant hernias of the abdominal wall. Cir Esp 91:444–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ciresp.2012.08.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ibarra-Hurtado TR, Nuño-Guzmán CM, Echeagaray-Herrera JE et al (2009) Use of botulinum toxin type a before abdominal wall hernia reconstruction. World J Surg 33:2553–2556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0203-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ibarra-Hurtado TR, Nuño-Guzmán CM, Miranda-Díaz AG et al (2014) Effect of botulinum toxin type A in lateral abdominal wall muscles thickness and length of patients with midline incisional hernia secondary to open abdomen management. Hernia 18:647–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1280-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bueno-Lledó J, TorregrosaGallud A, Jiménez Rosellón R et al (2017) Preoperative preparation of loss of domain hernia. Progressive pneumoperitoneum and botulinum toxin type A. Cir Esp 95:245–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ciresp.2017.04.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rodriguez-Acevedo O, Elstner KE, Jacombs ASW et al (2018) Preoperative Botulinum toxin A enabling defect closure and laparoscopic repair of complex ventral hernia. SurgEndosc 32:831–839. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5750-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Farooque F, Jacombs ASW, Roussos E et al (2016) Preoperative abdominal muscle elongation with botulinum toxin A for complex incisional ventral hernia repair. ANZ J Surg 86:79–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.13258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Catalán-Garza V, Peña-Soria MJ, Sáez-Carlin P et al (2020) Long-term results of botulinum toxin type A in complex abdominal wall repair and review of the literature. Updates Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00775-w

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bueno-Lledó J, Torregrosa A, Jiménez R, Pastor PG (2018) Preoperative combination of progressive pneumoperitoneum and botulinum toxin type A in patients with loss of domain hernia. SurgEndosc 32:3599–3608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6089-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Yurtkap Y, van Rooijen MMJ, Roels S et al (2020) Implementing preoperative Botulinum toxin A and progressive pneumoperitoneum through the use of an algorithm in giant ventral hernia repair. Hernia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02226-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Elstner KE, Read JW, Rodriguez-Acevedo O et al (2017) Preoperative progressive pneumoperitoneum complementing chemical component relaxation in complex ventral hernia repair. SurgEndosc 31:1914–1922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5194-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Bueno-Lledó J, Carreño-Saenz O, Torregrosa-Gallud A, Pous-Serrano S (2020) Preoperative botulinum toxin and progressive pneumoperitoneum in loss of domain hernias-our first 100 cases. Front Surg 7:3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2020.00003

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Kanters AE, Krpata DM, Blatnik JA et al (2012) Modified hernia grading scale to stratify surgical site occurrence after open ventral hernia repairs. J Am CollSurg 215:787–793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.08.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Docimo S, Spaniolas K, Svestka M et al (2019) Increased incidence of surgical site infection with a body mass index ≥ 35 kg/m2 following abdominal wall reconstruction with open component separation. SurgEndosc 33:2503–2507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6538-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Sabbagh C, Dumont F, Robert B et al (2011) Peritoneal volume is predictive of tension-free fascia closure of large incisional hernias with loss of domain: a prospective study. Hernia 15:559–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-011-0832-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Stoppa R, Ralaimiaramanana F, Henry X, Verhaeghe P (1999) Evolution of large ventral incisional hernia repair. The French contribution to a difficult problem. Hernia 3:1–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01576729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kingsnorth A (2006) The management of incisional Hernia. Ann R CollSurgEngl 88:252–260. https://doi.org/10.1308/003588406X106324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Chevrel JP, Rath AM (2000) Classification of incisional hernias of the abdominal wall. Hernia 4:7–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01230581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Parker SG, Halligan S, Liang MK et al (2020) Definitions for loss of domain: an international Delphi consensus of expert surgeons. World J Surg 44:1070–1078. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-05317-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Parker SG, Halligan S, Blackburn S et al (2019) What exactly is meant by “loss of domain” for ventral hernia? Systematic review of definitions. World J Surg 43:396–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4783-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Mancini A, Mougin N, Venchiarutti V et al (2020) Goni Moreno progressive preoperative pneumoperitoneum for giant hernias: a monocentric retrospective study of 162 patients. Hernia 24:545–550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-02113-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Agnew SP, Small W, Wang E et al (2010) Prospective measurements of intra-abdominal volume and pulmonary function after repair of massive ventral hernias with the components separation technique. Ann Surg 251:981–988. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181d7707b

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. De Santis L, Frigo F, Bruttocao A, Terranova O (2003) Pathophysiology of giant incisional hernias with loss of abdominal wall substance. Acta Biomed 74(Suppl 2):34–37

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Henriksen NA, Montgomery A, Kaufmann R et al (2020) Guidelines for treatment of umbilical and epigastric hernias from the European Hernia Society and Americas Hernia Society. Br J Surg 107:171–190. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11489

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Parker SG, Wood CPJ, Butterworth JW et al (2018) A systematic methodological review of reported perioperative variables, postoperative outcomes and hernia recurrence from randomised controlled trials of elective ventral hernia repair: clear definitions and standardised datasets are needed. Hernia 22:215–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1718-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Tanaka EY, Yoo JH, Rodrigues AJ et al (2010) A computerized tomography scan method for calculating the hernia sac and abdominal cavity volume in complex large incisional hernia with loss of domain. Hernia 14:63–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-009-0560-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Kingsnorth AN, Sivarajasingham N, Wong S, Butler M (2004) Open mesh repair of incisional hernias with significant loss of domain. Ann R CollSurgEngl 86:363–366. https://doi.org/10.1308/147870804236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Punjani R, Shaikh I, Soni V (2015) Component separation technique: an effective way of treating large ventral hernia. Indian J Surg 77:1476–1479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-015-1265-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Novitsky YW, Fayezizadeh M, Majumder A et al (2016) Outcomes of posterior component separation with transversusabdominis muscle release and synthetic mesh sublay reinforcement. Ann Surg 264:226–232. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Cornette B, De Bacquer D, Berrevoet F (2018) Component separation technique for giant incisional hernia: a systematic review. Am J Surg 215:719–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.07.032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Appleton ND, Anderson KD, Hancock K et al (2017) Initial UK experience with transversusabdominis muscle release for posterior components separation in abdominal wall reconstruction of large or complex ventral hernias: a combined approach by general and plastic surgeons. Ann R CollSurgEngl 99:265–270. https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2016.0241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Fayezizadeh M, Majumder A, Belyansky I, Novitsky YW (2016) Outcomes of retromuscular porcine biologic mesh repairs using transversusabdominis release reconstruction. J Am CollSurg 223:461–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.06.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Jones CM, Winder JS, Potochny JD, Pauli EM (2016) Posterior component separation with transversusabdominis release: technique, utility, and outcomes in complex abdominal wall reconstruction. PlastReconstrSurg 137:636–646. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000475778.45783.e2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Loh CYY, Nizamoglu M, Shanmugakrishnan RR et al (2018) Comparing transversusabdominus release and anterior component separation techniques in reconstructing midline hernias: a cadaveric study. J PlastReconstrAesthetSurg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2018.06.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Pauli EM, Rosen MJ (2013) Open ventral hernia repair with component separation. SurgClin North Am 93:1111–1133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2013.06.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Torregrosa-Gallud A, Sancho Muriel J, Bueno-Lledó J et al (2017) Modified components separation technique: experience treating large, complex ventral hernias at a University Hospital. Hernia 21:601–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1619-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Winder JS, Behar BJ, Juza RM et al (2016) Transversusabdominis release for abdominal wall reconstruction: early experience with a novel technique. J Am CollSurg 223:271–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.04.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Blair LJ, Ross SW, Huntington CR et al (2015) Computed tomographic measurements predict component separation in ventral hernia repair. J Surg Res 199:420–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2015.06.033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Majumder A, Martin-Del-Campo LA, Miller HJ et al (2020) Evaluation of anterior versus posterior component separation for hernia repair in a cadaveric model. SurgEndosc 34:2682–2689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07046-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Maloney SR, Schlosser KA, Prasad T et al (2019) Twelve years of component separation technique in abdominal wall reconstruction. Surgery 166:435–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2019.05.043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Ennis LS, Young JS, Gampper TJ, Drake DB (2003) The “open-book” variation of component separation for repair of massive midline abdominal wall hernia. Am Surg 69:733–742 (discussion 742–743)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Wegdam JA, Thoolen JMM, Nienhuijs SW et al (2019) Systematic review of transversusabdominis release in complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Hernia 23:5–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1870-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Lardière-Deguelte S, Appere F, Goia A-V et al (2010) Efficacité du pneumopéritoineprogressifpré- opératoiredans le traitement des grandeséventrations: évaluationvolumétrique par tomodensitométrie. E-mémoires de l’AcadémieNationale de Chirurgie 9:103–106. https://doi.org/10.14607/emem.2010.2.103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Martínez-Hoed J, Bonafe-Diana S, Bueno-Lledó J (2020) A systematic review of the use of progressive preoperative pneumoperitoneum since its inception. Hernia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02247-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Weissler JM, Lanni MA, Tecce MG et al (2017) Chemical component separation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of botulinum toxin for management of ventral hernia. J PlastSurg Hand Surg 51:366–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/2000656X.2017.1285783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Bueno-Lledó J, Martinez-Hoed J, Torregrosa-Gallud A et al (2020) Botulinum toxin to avoid component separation in midline large hernias. Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2020.04.050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Cakmak M, Caglayan F, Somuncu S et al (2006) Effect of paralysis of the abdominal wall muscles by botulinum A toxin to intraabdominal pressure: an experimental study. J PediatrSurg 41:821–825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.12.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The present research did not receive any financial rewards.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Ahmad Tashkandi, Jules Durtette-Guzylack, Antoine Cayeux and Yohann Renard. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Ahmad Tashkandi and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Tashkandi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The present study includes patients operated on using routine and local standards. The two techniques reported in the present article were locally protocolized for a long time and followed the current state-of-the-science of incisional hernia management.

Consent for publication

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent to participate

The folders of all patients were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received adequate information and gave their written informed consent to be operated on following our local protocol.

Conflicts of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tashkandi, A., Bueno-Lledó, J., Durtette-Guzylack, J. et al. Adjunct botox to preoperative progressive pneumoperitoneum for incisional hernia with loss of domain: no additional effect but may improve outcomes. Hernia 25, 1507–1517 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-021-02387-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-021-02387-8

Keywords

Navigation