Connecting flights hold the key to low-cost long-haul success
Is the low oil price clouding European carriers' judgement?

By M.R.
IT IS a peculiarity of the airline business that a connecting flight is often cheaper than a shorter nonstop route to the same destination. Normally, paying less to receive more is economically preposterous. But in transportation, where the fastest conveyance from A to B is the main utility, it makes perfect sense. For passengers, sitting on a plane any longer than necessary can be an exasperating, even painful experience. For airlines, flying empty seats is no less harmful. This inverse relationship between a journey’s value and its cost is something that Europe’s new breed of long-haul budget carriers may be overlooking.

Reclaiming the office lunch
Why stopping to eat is a good idea

The trade war may reverse Hong Kong’s commercial decline
Asia’s once-dominant business centre is regaining ground lost to Shanghai, Singapore and New York

LinkedIn’s unlikely role in the AI race
People are using the social network differently. It is using them differently, too
Spanish business thrives while bigger European economies stall
Cheap energy and high immigration are the motors of success
How to swerve Donald Trump’s tariffs
Using cunning or flattery is a good start
A new way to recycle plastic is here
Environmentalists hate it