Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The earth is our home: systemic metaphors to redefine our relationship with nature

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Climate change is one of the most compelling challenges for science communication today. Societal reforms are necessary to reduce the risks posed by a changing climate, yet many people fail to recognize climate change as a serious issue. Unfortunately, the accumulation of scientific data, in itself, has failed to compel the general public on the urgent need for pro-environmental policy action. We argue that certain metaphors for the human-environment relationship can lead people to adopt a more nuanced and responsible conception of their place in the natural world. In two studies, we tested properties of multiple metaphors with the general public (study 1) and experts on climate change (study 2). The metaphor “the earth is our home” resonated with climate experts as well as diverse subpopulations of the general public, including conservatives and climate-change deniers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bain PG et al (2012) Promoting pro-environmental action in climate change deniers. Nat Clim Chang 2:600–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bain PG et al (2016) Co-benefits of addressing climate change can motivate action around the world. Nat Clim Chang 6:154–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernauer T (2013) Climate change politics. Annu Rev Polit Sci 16:421–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernauer T, McGrath LF (2016) Simple reframing unlikely to boost public support for climate policy. Nat Clim Chang. doi:10.1038/nclimate2948

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess MM (2014) From ‘trust us’ to participatory governance: deliberative publics and science policy. Public Underst Sci 23:48–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, Y., Lenton, T. M., & Lontzek, T. S. (2016). Risk of multiple interacting tipping points should encourage rapid CO2 emission reduction. Nature Climate Change. doi:10.1038/nclimate2964

  • Checkland P (1981) Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Citron FMM, Goldberg AE (2014) Metaphorical sentences are more emotionally engaging than their literal counterparts. J Cogn Neurosci 26:2585–2595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clifford S, Jewell RM, Waggoner PD (2015) Are samples drawn from Mechanical Turk valid for research on political ideology? Res Polit 2(4):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck C (2006) Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Elwood WN (1995) Declaring war on the home front: metaphor, presidents, and the war on drugs. Metaphor Symb 10:93–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg M, Willer R (2011) Apocalypse soon? Dire messages reduce belief in global warming by contradicting just-world beliefs. Psychol Sci 22:34–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman L, Hart PS, Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C (2015) Do hostile media perceptions lead to action? The role of hostile media perceptions, political efficacy, and ideology in predicting climate change activism. Commun Res 0093650214565914

  • Francis P (2015) Laudato si. Encyclical Letter of the Holy Father (On care for our common home). Retrieved April 25, 2016 from http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/encyclicals/documents/papa-francesco_20150524_enciclica-laudato-si.html

  • Furnham A (2003) Belief in a just world: research progress over the past decade. Personal Individ Differ 34:795–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallup (2015) Most important problem. Retrieved October 20, 2015, from http://www.gallup.com/poll/1675/most-important-problem.aspx

  • Gibbs R (1994) The poetics of mind. Cambridge University Press

  • Hung W (2008) Enhancing systems-thinking skills with modeling. Br J Educ Technol 39:1099–1120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaeble D, Glaze L, Tsoutis A, Minton T (2015) Correctional populations in the United States, 2014. Tech. Rep. NCJ 249513, Bureau of Justice Statistics

  • Kahan DM et al (2012) The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nat Clim Chang 2:732–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keysar B, Bly B (1995) Intuitions of the transparency of idioms: can one keep a secret by spilling the beans? J Mem Lang 34:89–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff G (2010) Why it matters how we frame the environment. Environ Commun 4:70–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff G, Johnson M (1980) Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson B (2011) Metaphors for environmental sustainability: redefining our relationship with nature. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C, Feinberg G, Rosenthal S (2015) Climate change in the American mind: October, 2015. Yale Project on Climate Change Communication. Yale University and George Mason University, New Haven, Retrieved April 25, 2016 from http://environment.yale.edu/climate/files/PolicySupportJune2010.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Lezak S, Thibodeau PH (2016) Systems thinking and environmental concern. J Environ Psychol 46:143–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCright AM, Dunlap RE (2011) The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views on global warming. Sociol Q 52:155–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadows DH, Wright D (2008) Thinking in systems: a primer. Chelsea Green Publishing, White River Junction

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller G, Spoolman S (1988) Environmental science: problems, connections and solutions. Thomson, Belmont

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers TA, Nisbet MC, Maibach EW, Leiserowitz AA (2012) A public health frame arouses hopeful emotions about climate change. Clim Chang 113:1105–1112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nerlich B, Koteyko N, Brown B (2010) Theory and language of climate change communication. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 1:97–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill S, Nicholson-Cole S (2009) “Fear Won’t Do It” promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Sci Commun 30:355–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pachauri RK et al (2014) Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

  • Petrovic N, Madrigano J, Zaval L (2014) Motivating mitigation: when health matters more than climate change. Clim Chang 126:245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Primavesi A (2008) Gaia and climate change: a theology of gift events. Rutledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Princen T (2010) Speaking of sustainability: the potential of metaphor. Sustain: Sci, Pract Policy 6:60–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz B, Sharpe K (2010) Practical wisdom: the right way to do the right thing. Penguin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw C, Nerlich B (2015) Metaphor as a mechanism of global climate change governance: a study of international policies, 1992–2012. Ecol Econ 109:34–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sopory P, Dillard JP (2002) The persuasive effects of metaphor: a meta-analysis. Hum Commun Res 28:382–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence A, Pidgeon N (2010) Framing and communicating climate change: the effects of distance and outcome frame manipulations. Glob Environ Chang 20:656–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stehr N (2015) Climate policy: democracy is not an inconvenience. Nature 525:449–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterman JD (2010) Does formal system dynamics training improve people’s understanding of accumulation? Syst Dyn Rev 26:316–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thibodeau PH, Boroditsky L (2011) Metaphors we think with: the role of metaphor in reasoning. PLoS ONE 6:e16782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thibodeau PH, Frantz CM, Stroink ML (2016a) Situating a measure of systems thinking in a landscape of psychological constructs. Syst Res Behav Sci 33:753–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thibodeau PH, Winneg A, Frantz CM, Flusberg SJ (2016b) The mind is an ecosystem: systemic metaphors promote systems thinking. Metaphor Soc World 6:224–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden SL, Leiserowitz AA, Feinberg GD, Maibach EW (2015) The scientific consensus on climate change as a gateway belief: experimental evidence. PLoS ONE 10:e0118489

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research for this article was financially supported by the National Science Foundation (grant no. 1534479; assessing the effect of systems thinking on decision-making).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul H. Thibodeau.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 1398 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thibodeau, P.H., Frantz, C.M. & Berretta, M. The earth is our home: systemic metaphors to redefine our relationship with nature. Climatic Change 142, 287–300 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-1926-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-1926-z

Keywords

Navigation