Abstract
Climate change is one of the most compelling challenges for science communication today. Societal reforms are necessary to reduce the risks posed by a changing climate, yet many people fail to recognize climate change as a serious issue. Unfortunately, the accumulation of scientific data, in itself, has failed to compel the general public on the urgent need for pro-environmental policy action. We argue that certain metaphors for the human-environment relationship can lead people to adopt a more nuanced and responsible conception of their place in the natural world. In two studies, we tested properties of multiple metaphors with the general public (study 1) and experts on climate change (study 2). The metaphor “the earth is our home” resonated with climate experts as well as diverse subpopulations of the general public, including conservatives and climate-change deniers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bain PG et al (2012) Promoting pro-environmental action in climate change deniers. Nat Clim Chang 2:600–603
Bain PG et al (2016) Co-benefits of addressing climate change can motivate action around the world. Nat Clim Chang 6:154–157
Bernauer T (2013) Climate change politics. Annu Rev Polit Sci 16:421–448
Bernauer T, McGrath LF (2016) Simple reframing unlikely to boost public support for climate policy. Nat Clim Chang. doi:10.1038/nclimate2948
Burgess MM (2014) From ‘trust us’ to participatory governance: deliberative publics and science policy. Public Underst Sci 23:48–52
Cai, Y., Lenton, T. M., & Lontzek, T. S. (2016). Risk of multiple interacting tipping points should encourage rapid CO2 emission reduction. Nature Climate Change. doi:10.1038/nclimate2964
Checkland P (1981) Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. John Wiley & Sons, New York
Citron FMM, Goldberg AE (2014) Metaphorical sentences are more emotionally engaging than their literal counterparts. J Cogn Neurosci 26:2585–2595
Clifford S, Jewell RM, Waggoner PD (2015) Are samples drawn from Mechanical Turk valid for research on political ideology? Res Polit 2(4):1–9
Dweck C (2006) Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House, New York
Elwood WN (1995) Declaring war on the home front: metaphor, presidents, and the war on drugs. Metaphor Symb 10:93–114
Feinberg M, Willer R (2011) Apocalypse soon? Dire messages reduce belief in global warming by contradicting just-world beliefs. Psychol Sci 22:34–38
Feldman L, Hart PS, Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C (2015) Do hostile media perceptions lead to action? The role of hostile media perceptions, political efficacy, and ideology in predicting climate change activism. Commun Res 0093650214565914
Francis P (2015) Laudato si. Encyclical Letter of the Holy Father (On care for our common home). Retrieved April 25, 2016 from http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/encyclicals/documents/papa-francesco_20150524_enciclica-laudato-si.html
Furnham A (2003) Belief in a just world: research progress over the past decade. Personal Individ Differ 34:795–817
Gallup (2015) Most important problem. Retrieved October 20, 2015, from http://www.gallup.com/poll/1675/most-important-problem.aspx
Gibbs R (1994) The poetics of mind. Cambridge University Press
Hung W (2008) Enhancing systems-thinking skills with modeling. Br J Educ Technol 39:1099–1120
Kaeble D, Glaze L, Tsoutis A, Minton T (2015) Correctional populations in the United States, 2014. Tech. Rep. NCJ 249513, Bureau of Justice Statistics
Kahan DM et al (2012) The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nat Clim Chang 2:732–735
Keysar B, Bly B (1995) Intuitions of the transparency of idioms: can one keep a secret by spilling the beans? J Mem Lang 34:89–109
Lakoff G (2010) Why it matters how we frame the environment. Environ Commun 4:70–81
Lakoff G, Johnson M (1980) Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Larson B (2011) Metaphors for environmental sustainability: redefining our relationship with nature. Yale University Press, New Haven
Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C, Feinberg G, Rosenthal S (2015) Climate change in the American mind: October, 2015. Yale Project on Climate Change Communication. Yale University and George Mason University, New Haven, Retrieved April 25, 2016 from http://environment.yale.edu/climate/files/PolicySupportJune2010.pdf
Lezak S, Thibodeau PH (2016) Systems thinking and environmental concern. J Environ Psychol 46:143–153
McCright AM, Dunlap RE (2011) The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views on global warming. Sociol Q 52:155–194
Meadows DH, Wright D (2008) Thinking in systems: a primer. Chelsea Green Publishing, White River Junction
Miller G, Spoolman S (1988) Environmental science: problems, connections and solutions. Thomson, Belmont
Myers TA, Nisbet MC, Maibach EW, Leiserowitz AA (2012) A public health frame arouses hopeful emotions about climate change. Clim Chang 113:1105–1112
Nerlich B, Koteyko N, Brown B (2010) Theory and language of climate change communication. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 1:97–110
O’Neill S, Nicholson-Cole S (2009) “Fear Won’t Do It” promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Sci Commun 30:355–379
Pachauri RK et al (2014) Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
Petrovic N, Madrigano J, Zaval L (2014) Motivating mitigation: when health matters more than climate change. Clim Chang 126:245
Primavesi A (2008) Gaia and climate change: a theology of gift events. Rutledge, New York
Princen T (2010) Speaking of sustainability: the potential of metaphor. Sustain: Sci, Pract Policy 6:60–65
Schwartz B, Sharpe K (2010) Practical wisdom: the right way to do the right thing. Penguin, New York
Shaw C, Nerlich B (2015) Metaphor as a mechanism of global climate change governance: a study of international policies, 1992–2012. Ecol Econ 109:34–40
Sopory P, Dillard JP (2002) The persuasive effects of metaphor: a meta-analysis. Hum Commun Res 28:382–419
Spence A, Pidgeon N (2010) Framing and communicating climate change: the effects of distance and outcome frame manipulations. Glob Environ Chang 20:656–667
Stehr N (2015) Climate policy: democracy is not an inconvenience. Nature 525:449–450
Sterman JD (2010) Does formal system dynamics training improve people’s understanding of accumulation? Syst Dyn Rev 26:316–334
Thibodeau PH, Boroditsky L (2011) Metaphors we think with: the role of metaphor in reasoning. PLoS ONE 6:e16782
Thibodeau PH, Frantz CM, Stroink ML (2016a) Situating a measure of systems thinking in a landscape of psychological constructs. Syst Res Behav Sci 33:753–769
Thibodeau PH, Winneg A, Frantz CM, Flusberg SJ (2016b) The mind is an ecosystem: systemic metaphors promote systems thinking. Metaphor Soc World 6:224–241
van der Linden SL, Leiserowitz AA, Feinberg GD, Maibach EW (2015) The scientific consensus on climate change as a gateway belief: experimental evidence. PLoS ONE 10:e0118489
Acknowledgements
The research for this article was financially supported by the National Science Foundation (grant no. 1534479; assessing the effect of systems thinking on decision-making).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(DOCX 1398 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thibodeau, P.H., Frantz, C.M. & Berretta, M. The earth is our home: systemic metaphors to redefine our relationship with nature. Climatic Change 142, 287–300 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-1926-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-1926-z