Why Snapchat's only way is an IPO and why it will (eventually) fail
Snapchat website - Spectacles

Why Snapchat's only way is an IPO and why it will (eventually) fail

Snapchat, claiming to be worth $25B, where no one knows how many active users it really has, is going public. Probably serving as the only way the company can actually can make money for its founders and early investors - there is no exit opportunity for the company at the valuation it is setting for the IPO.

Benchmarks - only Facebook and WhatsApp

A company going public - Facebook went public in May 2012 worth $104B - but it had 845M monthly active users. But Facebook already had $1B of quarterly revenue. Snapchat has a tiny fraction of that (maybe $50 - 100M, but noone knows).

We could also compare WhatsApp, which cost Facebook quite a buck to acquire. But WhatsApp we can still argue is now several times more valuable than Snapchat, with over 1B monthly active users - was worth $22B.

So what could justify Snapchat's huge valuation? Definitely not openness, transparency, and a direct approach to the market.

Snapchat and transparent? No thank you!

Go ahead and look through any public records and you will not be able to find a single official document talking about Snapchat's either revenues or monthly active users. It has also filed for an IPO confidentially, which companies under $1B in revenue can do. There are no information on any of Snapchats figures.

Back in November 2015 Fidelity marked down its then recent investment into Snapchat by 25%.

Fierce competition from Instagram, Facebook, and Messenger apps

Snapchat did some good things - it has taught us a new, vertical video and photo format. It also became the go-to-cool social platform for youngsters - and still to a large extent is.

And then Instagram launched Stories. Facebook also launched Stories in Messenger - and you will see that very soon, Facebook will launch more me too functionality in the area.

Spectacles to the rescue?

But maybe electronics products are something Snapchat can go after and win big. Snap Inc. could claim: "Actually, we are a fashion camera company doing electronics, and we will incorporate little cameras everywhere." - while that could be the case, it exclusively publishing into the Snapchat application means the app would have to remain very, very cool.

Snapchat - downloads still doing great

One thing is clear - people still download Snapchat and Snapchat is able to create amazing buzz. Clearly, their app store rankings is doing well - flat in some markets YoY (which is good to keep such a high position), some markets already showing a small dip.

The question is - even if downloads are great, what is the app engagement like? Do the people that download it really go ahead and use it, or is it just prolonged craze - I have to have Snapchat - but people don't actually use it or get it. I have 830 users on Snapchat and 5 of them have published stories - this number is 55 on Instagram Stories.

Main app - Slow user activity death?

When I always watch trends, I go around and ask influencers and celebrities on the platforms - Influencers on Snapchat are reporting numbers falling to 50% of original values in Europe. Instagram has a much bigger base to convert into stories. Time will tell - but with Facebook matching the functionalities and showing better scale, we will see where it all gets.

Snapchat Media app - a chance for the future?

The place Snapchat could claim a lot of work is on the publishers side - it could say this is now how people want to consume news, and take a bite even out of Twitter in its real-time way of doing things. Basically, Snapchat would curate and create news, while news organisations would start producing in this format. Snapchat could claim this is the lifestyle way of consuming news around you, and in case they get to a certain scale, they could make it.

Why go public? It's the only way.

At this point, Snapchat serves as a great free innovation hub for Facebook, where Facebook can just take anything it likes, test it, and scale it. Facebook even admitted the great inspiration it has in Snapchat, so Facebook is not likely to buy it.

Any likely exit now would be a down round from original investors valuations, and its quite obvious the company won't raise more money in a traditional way - which means the only way for founders to get rid of those investor preferences and convert is via an IPO, and make it look all shiny. They could even go public and later exit without those preferences marking that it was the only way.

At this point, you have to think - Snapchat better get a lot of lipstick out.

Dipanshu Sharma

Managing Director and CEO at PROTONe Managing Concepts | Digital Media Marketing & Social Media Expert

6y

🌍Websites, 📱AndroidApps, 🛍eCommerce, 🚀Digital Marketing, 🎥Add Films, 🃏GIF Making, 📢Branding & 📺Advertising and many more services in one place for you.. So you can 🎯focus on your Business, what you love to do.. 📞 +917983842329 🌍https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6344088141451890688

Like
Reply
Gerard Pacificar

Graphic, Production, Presentation Deck Design

7y

First off. This author needs an editor. Many instances of odd grammar usage thereby making the article plodding in some places. "(Snapchat) has taught us a new, vertical video and photo format." The vertical video format is not new and the vertical photo has been around since the advent of photography. YouTube has many vertical videos and the comments are largely unkind to thy format. Snapchat made the vertical format acceptable for certain subject matter.

Ryan Foley

Sales Development Representative at Merchant Cost Consultants

7y

Why Facebook and Instagram are successful in large sum of monetizing is because they make the offer inclusive of nearly anyone with any budget. You can be a solopreneur with a budget of $300/week and still make these platforms money. They take the longview and realize that attracting only big fish can be a downfall. The smaller publishers often keep you afloat. At this juncture, per https://www.linkedin.com/company/wallaroo-media, their initial ad placement is $50,000 minimally. That's the same cost as a network television ad spot. Right now, YouTube has mega users which have concrete numbers in the millions of subscribers range, and their ad placement cost is far less. The bottom line is, Snap, Inc is going to have to rely on heavy volume to match its valuation by year's end because they'll ultimately have to slash their prices and open up to the 'small guy'.

Zachary Grove

Head of Grove St Capital

7y

"alternative facts" clearly don't understand Snap Inc's long term vision

Chris J.

CISSP | Cyber Security Engineer | Cloud Security Author and Trainer

7y

Complete trash! Whats up with all these LinkedIn articles about "Why (insert popular company) will fail". SnapChat is very popular and will evolve over time. Stop the hate articles!

To view or add a comment, sign in

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics