BETA
This is a BETA experience. You may opt-out by clicking here

More From Forbes

Edit Story

Is This The First Example Of Truly 'Beautiful' Wearable Tech?

This article is more than 9 years old.

Photo: Tim P. Whitby/Getty Images

A big argument against the wearable tech that’s out in the market so far is very simply that it's, well… ugly. Until recently wearables have largely been dominated by clunky, boxy designs that have had a fairly masculine feel to them.

Apple last week attempted to introduce a solution on this aesthetic (as well as functional) front with its new Apple Watch. It was a step in the right direction, though one inevitably still met with mixed response. Over in New York meanwhile, wearables were trending at Fashion Week too, with releases spanning Opening Ceremony and Intel , Rebecca Minkoff and Case-Mate and Diesel Black Gold with the new Samsung Gear S.

Each of those likewise focused on a piece you wear around your wrist, and though improved with things like studs and semi-precious stones, still had somewhat of a clunky design aesthetic.

So it’s interesting to see London take an entirely different route. Rather than thinking about devices, the talk of this Fashion Week has been about the introduction of a light-up dress in partnership with Disney at Richard Nicoll’s show yesterday.

Let me pre-empt your response by saying that’s the kind of wearable tech I would usually roll my eyes at too – a tick the box PR stunt that solely appeals to the likes of Katy Perry or Fergie from the Black Eyed Peas. It was inspired by Tinkerbell too, I hear you cry? Hear me out…

Created in collaboration with London-based fashion and technology company Studio XO, this slip dress was made from a fibre optic fabric activated by high intensity LEDs tailored within it. The result was almost like an ethereal glow.

As Matthew Drinkwater, head of the Fashion Innovation Agency, which brought Richard Nicoll, Studio XO and Disney together, said: “It created a magical pixie dust effect down the catwalk.” And that wasn’t far off the truth. The typically frosty fashion crowd accordingly gave a very positive reception.

The Independent referred to it as “Tinkerbell for the 21st Century”, while Tatler’s fashion associate tweeted: “FAINTING over the opening look at Richard Nicoll - a light up fibre optic LED minidress. HELL YES.”

“It was imperative for Richard that what went down the catwalk was ‘fashion’ not ‘tech’. The gasps were audible as the dress appeared, it was a huge moment for fashion technology. We’d built something that was truly desirable,” Drinkwater added.

We’ve become so caught up with wearables being about devices that offer us some form of communication strapped to our arms rather than sat in our pockets, or tracking our steps and measuring our heart rates – and trying to tie that in so wholeheartedly with the fashion industry – that maybe we’ve just forgotten that what we’re actually after is something that just genuinely looks great.

Fashion is about what’s new, but it’s even more about what makes the wearer look and feel beautiful. So does our new wearable tech actually need to really ‘do’ anything? Can it not just be that it enhances the clothes we are wearing to make them even better than they were before?

Sequins do that, a perfectly cut silk dress does that, a Mary Katrantzou print does that. Back on the wearable tech front, we could also go as far as to consider developments in fibres that help keep us cool, wick away sweat and save us having to iron, all really as developments under that same heading.

The beauty with these examples is that it’s happened naturally, we haven’t noticed, and it’s made our lives better. Technology should be the invisible part in this more prominent fashion game too; and fortunately that seems to be where we’re headed.

Speaking at a fashion and tech talk hosted by the British Fashion Council during London Fashion Week, Nancy Tilbury, co-founder and director of Studio XO, said: “The technology is starting to disappear making it the ideal time for the fashion industry to get involved. The textile world is about to come alive because of these wonderful new technologies.”

She imagines a future less than 10 years away where we will be able to change the surface of our clothes; where we’ll be able to walk into a room and transform what we’re wearing like a chameleon does his skin.

Drinkwater refers to the Richard Nicoll project as “a stepping stone to designers genuinely using hi-tech materials within their collection as a matter of course”. It’s important that it doesn’t feel like the ‘jarring tech-piece’, he explained. “I’m asked regularly what clothes will look like in the future and I really believe that if fashion tech is to be successful then they will look as they do now. I want the clothes to be the story, [so] the tech must be integrated seamlessly.”

The more it is, the more we can go back to fashion being about fashion; not about clunky digital devices, but about beautifully well-made dresses that we all want to wear.

Perhaps a little sprinkling of fairy dust is just what we need.