NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Supplemental figure and tables

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.435v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

There are no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Dennis Evangelista conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Sharlene Cam performed the experiments, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Tony Huynh performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Austin Kwong performed the experiments, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Homayun Mehrabani performed the experiments, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Kyle Tse performed the experiments, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Robert Dudley contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Grant Disclosures

The following grant information was disclosed by the authors:

NSF DGE-0903711

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of related data:

.stl files of the models and .nex files of the trees are provided as a revision-controlled Bitbucket repository at bitbucket.org/devangel77b/comparative-peerj-supplemental

Funding

DE was supported by an NSF Minority Graduate Research Fellowship, UC Chancellor's Fellowship, and NSF Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship (IGERT) #DGE-0903711. TH was supported by the University of California Museum of Palaeontology (UCMP). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
  Visitors   Views   Downloads