Who We Are, How We Vote: Mapping the U.S. Electorate

These maps show America's demographic fault lines in areas such as race and age. Select buttons or highlighted text to see how different slices voted in the 2012 presidential election.

Published April 17, 2015 at 12:09 ET
Advertisement

Education

A bachelor’s degree is still a fairly exclusive achievement in much of the U.S., particularly rural areas. Two trends are clear on these maps. In counties where high-school educations dominate, the edge for Mitt Romney and the Republicans is clear. Look at the map for bachelor’s degrees or graduate degrees and you can see how President Barack Obama won in well-educated population centers near big cities—New York, Chicago, Seattle—and in scattered college counties such as Champaign in Illinois, and Douglas in Kansas.

 
Note: Educational attainment is for ages 25 or older.

Age

The graying of America is particularly noticeable in the counties running through the center of the country. Look at the “senior” counties map to see Romney’s strength in those dark orange areas. Click to see counties by median age and note Obama’s strength in younger communities.

 

Race and Ethnicity

While the nation is diversifying, large parts of the country remain largely white and non-Hispanic. That’s significant at election time. Note the Romney vote in counties with large white, non-Hispanic populations. Conversely, you can see how Obama won a swath of counties in the Deep South with large African-American populations. Meanwhile, while Hispanics went heavily for Obama, Romney did well in less-populated rural counties with big Hispanic populations.

 

Income and Housing

Wealth in the United States tends to be clustered in and around major cities, while rural areas have lower incomes. Look at the median household income view and note Obama’s strength on the wealthy East and West coasts. Keeping with median household income, look at Romney’s map to see how higher-income suburban and exurban counties tilted toward him, creating a doughnut effect in metro areas such as Dallas and Columbus, Ohio. In addition, note how owner-occupied housing isn’t always the best way to measure wealth. Many Romney counties won have higher ownership numbers, but in those rural places homes are also relatively inexpensive.

 

Diversity and Rural/Urban Split

The impact of immigration and majority-minority communities is felt in a relatively small handful of counties. Look at the majority-minority counties map and you can see how Obama dominated. Romney’s strength in rural counties around the country is also apparent. The map of foreign-born populations shows a split. Obama won in and around cities with big foreign populations, while in rural places those counties mostly belonged to Romney.

 
Majority of population is nonwhite
Urban
Small town
Rural
Note: Urban is defined as counties having 50,000 or more residents. Small town counties have 49,999-10,000 residents. Rural places have less than 10,000 residents.

Presidential Vote

The county-by-county percentage votes for Obama and Romney paint a subtler picture of the political strength for each candidate. Click to see the percentage of votes for Obama and the northern Midwest looks closely divided. The president won a few counties decisively to capture states such as Ohio and Michigan. The same is true of Pennsylvania. Conversely, click to see the percentage of votes for Romney and the Plains states are a deep red, with the Republican winning more than 60% of the vote in most counties.

 
Obama won
Romney won
Note: Figures shown for Alaska counties are statewide results as the state doesn’t report data by county.
   

Just a reminder: Not all counties are created equal. Despite Romney having 77.9% of the counties go for him in 2012, those counties hold only 42.7% of the total population.

Total number of counties won by candidate
694
2,449
Total population of counties won by candidate
178.5 million
133.1 million