Home Data-Driven Thinking Viewability: Let’s End The Numbers Game

Viewability: Let’s End The Numbers Game

SHARE:

ericboscorevisedData-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Eric Bosco, CEO at ChoiceStream.

Viewability.

It’s a phrase tossed back and forth in sales meetings, delivered solemnly by speakers pacing conference stages and increasingly mandated by brands in their agency and vendor contracts. This metric has gone viral, taking a front seat in many digital advertising campaigns.

But its wildfire-like spread has caused many clients who demand it to overlook what it truly means beneath the surface. The actual measurement remains unstandardized and nascent. It is far from perfect. Yet many are so concerned with guaranteeing viewable impressions when something concrete, like conversion rates, may be suffering.

Viewability is still in its awkward teenage stage. It’s only been a year since the Media Rating Council (MRC) defined and passed guidance for display ads, and just six months since the IAB recommended 70% as a threshold for buyers and sellers. Experts are still evolving their opinions on what percentage of viewable impressions advertisers should shoot for and, more importantly, we still lack a uniform method of measurement.

The year 2015 should been deemed a “year of transition,” and there is a certainly much change ahead as far as viewability and its corresponding metrics go.

Large Discrepancies

Due to differences in measurement, I’ve seen discrepancies as high as 50% between third-party vendors for the same campaign. While 50% variance is the most extreme I’ve seen, a typical variance with almost any campaign is between 10% and 30%. In one recent campaign, I saw four top-tier vendors measure viewability at rates that varied by more than 30%, including 32%, 40%, 56% and 64%.

Truths like this exist because there is no set standard for how to measure viewability. Many brands look to the MRC for guidance and standards, but the MRC only verifies that viewability vendors measure as they say they do – that’s it. Viewability vendors can measure using browser optimization and/or page geometry, and can become certified with either or both methodologies.

It’s impossible to set threshold for viewability when vendors aren’t required to measure the same way, and variances are known to be this wide.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Flying Blind

Worse than the lack of standardization is that the focus on viewability blinds advertisers from their true campaign objectives. Assigning a viewability threshold to a programmatic campaign can actually sabotage conversion rates.

Viewability thresholds tie the hands of optimization analysts, requiring them to adjust audience targeting and media bidding to buy only those impressions that are deemed by a client’s viewability vendor as “viewable.” This leads to strict filters that often time overfilter impressions. Ad placements that could, in reality, be viewable to consumers can sometimes be filtered out pre-bid as “non-viewable.” This can hurt the scale of an advertiser’s audience and therefore undermine performance.

I’m in no way saying that viewability shouldn’t play a role in a campaign. It absolutely should. But since it’s still evolving and its measurement is not yet unified across all vendors, conversion rates should be the prioritized metric in direct-response campaigns.

Conversions are the true indicator of a qualified consumer viewing and engaging with an ad. Viewable impressions mean nothing to the objective of a campaign if the eyes on an ad belong to uninterested consumers. Readjusting a performance campaign’s focus from viewability to conversion addresses the importance of audience qualification.

Conversions are the ultimate measure of success for a performance campaign – whether it’s a form-fill, purchase or whatever a brand may decide on. While strict viewability requirements force brands to sacrifice conversions, flexible viewability rates allow campaign managers to optimize audience targeting to conversions, which is the most telling sign that an ad has been viewed, hopefully, by the right person.
I call on brands, agencies, ad tech vendors and publishers to talk more openly about the realities that surround viewability, and to work together toward a standardized solution. By collaborating as partners, rather than clients and service providers, commonalities will be found and discrepancies will narrow. Viewability will become a deliverable expectation, rather than just a numbers game.

Follow Eric Bosco (@ericbosco), ChoiceStream (@ChoiceStream) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

Pictograph of graph, mug of beer

Inside AB InBev’s Strategy For Tapping Into First-Party Data

Pour one out for third-party data. These days, AB InBev’s digital marketing strategy is built squarely on first-party data.

4A’s Measurement Committee Says New Currencies Aren’t Ready For Prime Time – Yet

The 4A’s measurement committee, a working group for marketers and media buyers to discuss their opinions and concerns about video ad measurement, has some thoughts on the status of alternative TV currencies.

How Chinese Sellers Are Quietly Reshaping US Consumer Habits

American consumers are buying more and more online products directly from Chinese manufacturers. It’s an important change, though many online shoppers are unaware.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

T-Commerce Vs. Shoppable TV

Television commerce, or T-commerce, is similar to shoppable TV: both refer to buying something you see on television. But shoppable TV is far more nascent – and also has different implications on attribution.

Why White Claw’s Parent Company Is Pouring Investment Into Headless Commerce

A booze brand and a “headless commerce” platform walk into a meeting with the CFO. That might sound like the setup for a punchline, but it’s just how mar tech works these days.

As MMM Rides Again, Google Finds Its Place In The Conversation With Meridian

Tracking is a mess. Attribution is broken beyond repair. IP address identity data may go the way of the dodo. Which means marketing mix modeling is back, baby!