United States | Slaughterhouses

A jungle no more

How Temple Grandin’s designs have reformed the meat industry

Ms Grandin and her charges
|FORT MORGAN, COLORADO

“THERE would be meat that had tumbled out on the floor, in the dirt and sawdust, where the workers had tramped and spit uncounted billions of consumption germs. There would be meat stored in great piles in rooms; and the water from leaky roofs would drip over it, and thousands of rats would race about on it.” Thankfully, much has changed since Upton Sinclair published “The Jungle”, a best-selling novel exposing the unsanitary conditions, labour practices and animal handling in the Chicago stockyards at the start of the last century. Sinclair’s book helped bring into existence, in 1906, the Pure Food and Drug Act and the Federal Meat Inspection Act, the first in a series of sanitary and consumer-protection laws. Chicago continued to be America’s slaughter capital until the 1950s, when slaughterhouses moved away because it was cheaper and more efficient to put them close to ranches and then to ship the meat around the country in refrigerated lorries.

As the industry evolved, animal welfare remained a secondary concern. As recently as the 1990s, conditions in beef slaughterhouses were pretty bad, says Temple Grandin of Colorado State University. In 1996 the United States Department of Agriculture found that only three in ten were able to stun 95% of their cattle with a single shot. Things started to change in 1999 when, under pressure from activists and the general public, McDonald’s, then the world’s biggest restaurant chain, started to monitor the animal welfare at its meat suppliers. Wendy’s and Burger King, two other fast-food chains, followed suit.

Ms Grandin has played a big part in the change. She is a star in two seemingly separate firmaments: animal welfare and the understanding of autism. Half the cattle in America and Canada today are slaughtered in equipment for restraining cattle designed by Ms Grandin, and around 35% of all cattle in America are handled in her curved chute and stockyard design. She has trained workers in more than 200 slaughterhouses all over the world. Meanwhile, she has become a sought-after speaker and writer on autism, a condition she has herself. “I was severely autistic as a child,” says Ms Grandin, who credits her mother for pushing her to lead a life as normal as possible and make use of her talents, which include an unusual facility for reading drawings in three dimensions.

As autism has become diagnosed more frequently in the developed world, Ms Grandin is in more demand than ever at conferences and symposiums. “It would take over if I let it,” she says. She tries to carve out as much time as possible for the welfare of animals, about which she cares deeply. Cargill’s Fort Morgan plant, one of America’s biggest slaughterhouses, uses equipment she designed. She took The Economist on a tour.

“I used to believe that there was an engineering solution to all of the animal-handling and stunning problems,” she says. But she quickly learned that the best equipment in the world is useless unless it is operated correctly. A stunbolt gun, for instance, has to be handled “like the finest hunting rifle” and cleaned every day; otherwise its pressure can slip, and it may fail to kill an animal instantly.

The Fort Morgan plant employs 2,100 people and slaughters 4,600 cows every day. It produces 2.5m pounds of finished beef daily, enough to feed one burger to everyone in New Jersey, says Allen Boelter, the manager of the plant. The tour starts backwards, where the beef is vacuum-sealed, put into boxes and loaded into enormous refrigerated lorries. Hygiene is a constant worry: the plant has two eight-hour shifts for slaughtering and one five-hour shift at the end of the day when the entire place is cleaned and disinfected.

Whereas sophisticated machinery takes care of many of the tasks in the packing and boxing part of the plant, workers in hard hats and overalls (with warm clothes underneath as the temperature is close to freezing) do most of the tasks in the slaughter area. They remove the animal’s hide, take out its internal organs, and tie off its rectum and oesophagus. The removal of the stomach and intestines is an especially important job, as one wrong cut can result in the contents of the intestines spilling on the carcass, which spoils the meat. As a last step the entire carcass is cleaned and hung in the misleadingly named “hot box” (which is even colder than the slaughter hall), where it is chilled for three days before it is cut into bits and pieces. All this is hard and bloody physical work that involves the handling of knives which are continually sharpened. Some employees wear coats made of chain mail to protect themselves from the blades.

After a tour of the “disassembly line” comes the part of the slaughterhouse that was improved by Ms Grandin’s designs. A gently curving, high-walled ramp, where cattle walk in single-file, leads into the restraining box. When they emerge from the restrainer they are killed, instantly, as a bolt powered by compressed air shoots through the brain. They flop onto a conveyor belt, a chain is looped around one leg, and the huge animal is lifted to hang upside-down, still kicking reflexively.

The curved chute with the high walls, Ms Grandin explains, prevents animals from seeing what is around them or glimpsing what lies at the end of their walk. Moreover it plays to their natural tendency to circle and return where they came from. A light is installed in the restraining box because cattle don’t like to walk into the dark. Non-slip flooring is provided inside and on the entrance ramp, as animals panic when they lose their footing. Most important, Ms Grandin says, is that there should be no distractions, in particular no high-pitched voices or shouting or unfamiliar items which could unsettle the cattle. Apart from causing unnecessary fear and anxiety in the animals, an increase in adrenalin just before slaughter will make their meat tough.

During the visit several of the cows are agitated and “vocalise”, jargon for mooing or bellowing. One even tries to jump out of the box just before it is stunned. This bothers Ms Grandin. After visiting the pens, where cattle gather for several hours after they arrive by lorry to calm them before they are slaughtered, she stops to listen for a while in front of the building with the curved chute. No sound emerges.

Do cattle know they are walking to their deaths? Ms Grandin thinks they do not. They behave in exactly the same way when they walk up the curved chute to get vaccinated. Some get agitated, but most just trot through. In her view, properly performed slaughter is less cruel than a more natural death at the jaws of wolves.

The tour ends in the control room, an innovation also advocated by Ms Grandin, where an employee monitors a real-time video feed of what is going on at the plant. A company unconnected to Cargill watches the footage. The professor is pleased to see that the stunning of the cattle proceeds calmly on screen, seemingly without the animal feeling any fear or premonition—just as it should be.

This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline "A jungle no more"

Kill seven diseases, save 1.2m lives a year

From the October 10th 2015 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from United States

In its latest abortion case the Supreme Court seems to back Idaho

Moyle v US asks if federal law protects women whose pregnancies threaten their health

The campus is coming for Joe Biden

As in 1968, the Democrat risks being the candidate of chaos and war


Efforts to tackle student protests in America have backfired badly

Police intervention at Columbia has provoked protests at other universities