This webinar presents the 6th PV Grid Parity Monitor issue, exclusively focused on the Chilean market.
PV competitiveness will be analyzed for three sectors: residential, commercial and utility-scale. The perspective of each analysis is essentially different and, consequently, so are the data and methodology considered for each segment. These aspects will be discussed during the webinar. The landscape of the current renewable energy regulation will also be depicted.
http://www.leonardo-energy.org/webinar/chilean-edition-pv-grid-parity-monitor
3. Creara and Eclareon (Spain) merged their business to form Creara Energy
Experts and consolidate their leadership in sustainable energy services
• Founded in Madrid in 2003
• Specialist in energy efficiency
and energy savings
• Opened in Madrid in 2005
• Management consultants in
smarter energy
RECENT CORPORATE EVENTS COMPANY OVERVIEW
Platinum sponsors:
3
and energy savings
• CREARA’s services:
- Consulting
- Engineering
- Management
- Training
smarter energy
• ECLAREON’s services:
- Policy consulting
- Strategy consulting
- Financial advisory
- Market intelligence
5. The GPM Series analyzes grid and generation parity in several
markets; this 6th issue focuses on the Chilean market
INTRODUCTION
Overview of PV GPM Series
Objective • To analyze the PV attractiveness for residential, commercial and utility-scale
segments
Geographical
Focus
• 14 promising markets all over the world
- Europe: France, Germany, Italy, UK, and Spain
- LatAm: Brazil, Chile and Mexico
- Other: Australia, Israel, Japan, Morocco, Turkey and USA (California and Texas)
GPM SERIES
Platinum sponsors:
Methodology
• It is based on a rigorous and transparent methodology
- This presentation includes a summary of the main assumptions and considerations
- Other: Australia, Israel, Japan, Morocco, Turkey and USA (California and Texas)
Frequency • It is recurrent: it will be updated every year to show the evolution of PV profitability
Inputs
• It uses real and up-dated data as inputs, not estimates
- Includes turnkey quotations of local PV installers from each of the countries under
study, as well as from global PV players
• It includes specific and detailed information per country (and city, when applicable)
- For example, the discount rate, retail electricity prices, and inflation
Source: CREARA
5
6. The PV Grid Parity Monitor is sponsored by renowned international
companies
INTRODUCTION
• Platinum Sponsors
SPONSORS
Platinum sponsors:
6
• Gold Sponsors
7. The PV Grid Parity Monitor is supported by relevant partners
Technical PartnersSupported by
INTRODUCTIONPARTNERS
Platinum sponsors:
Partner Association
7
8. PV “grid parity” is the moment when the cost of generating PV
electricity is equal to the price paid for grid electricity
DEFINITIONS & METHODOLOGY
Grid electricity price
PV electricity cost (LCOE*)
CLP /
kWh
Grid Parity
Simplistic Illustration of PV Grid Parity
RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL
Platinum sponsors:
For the sake of simplicity
this report compares PV
LCOE with retail electricity
prices
In reality, depending on the
local self-consumption
regulation, a part of the PV
generation might be lost or
valued at a lower rate (100%
self-consumption ratios are
not attainable)
Note: * Levelized Cost of Electricity
Source: CREARA analysis
Years
• Grid electricity is cheaper than
PV-generated electricity
- PV needs support
mechanisms (FiT, tax credit,
etc.)
• PV-generated electricity is
cheaper than grid electricity
- It is more convenient to self-
consume PV electricity than
to buy electricity from the
utility
8
9. LCOE of a PV system refers to the constant and theoretical
cost of generating PV electricity over the PV system lifetime
200
400
600
800
1.000
8,800
9,000Indicative Total Cost of a Small-Scale PV System • PV Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE)
accounts for all costs associated with a PV
system over its life
- These may include initial investment, O&M,
taxes, debt service, among others
• It assumes a constant value per year and is
expressed as cost per kWh
Initial Investment
Operating Expenses
Key:
DEFINITIONS & METHODOLOGYRESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL
‘000
CLP
Platinum sponsors:
0
200
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
0
50
100
150
200
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
CLP /
kWh
PV LCOE of the PV System
Source: CREARA analysis
expressed as cost per kWh
- It incorporates total PV electricity generated
over the system’s lifespan
• It considers the return required from the
investment, to discount future costs (and
production) to present
9
10. For the commercial segment, income taxes are relevant costs
and should be considered in the LCOE calculation
Cost flows of a commercial PV System
Initial investment
Operating expenses
Key:
Tax shield
• The commercial segment differs from the
residential segment:
- For a commercial electricity consumer
(private corporation), income taxes are
relevant costs, as they affect cash flows
• Therefore, this analysis calculates after-tax
costs and includes the impact of
‘000
CLP
DEFINITIONS & METHODOLOGYRESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL
Platinum sponsors:
Source: ECLAREON analysis
10
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28
PV LCOE of the PV System
costs and includes the impact of
depreciation for tax purposes
- The PV Levelized “After-Tax” Cost of
Electricity (simply, LCOE) is compared to
the after-tax cost of grid electricity
0
50
100
150
200
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
CLP /
kWh
11. For a specific PV system, PV LCOE is fixed as soon as the PV
system is built, but grid electricity prices are likely to increase
LCOE of PV Technology vs. Grid Electricity Price
0
50
100
150
200
2009S1 2009S2 2010S1 2010S2 2011S1 2011S2 2012S1
CLP/
kWh
LCOE of PV technology
Grid electricity price
DEFINITIONS & METHODOLOGYRESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL
Platinum sponsors:
2009S1 2009S2 2010S1 2010S2 2011S1 2011S2 2012S1
Years
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
CLP/
kWh
Years of operation of the PV system
Grid electricity price
LCOE of a specific PV system
installed in S1 2012
LCOE of A SPECIFIC PV System Installed S1 2012 vs. Grid Electricity Price
Source: CREARA analysis
11
12. PV “generation parity” is the moment when profitability
requirements of PV investors are completely fulfilled with
wholesale electricity prices
Reference price in the wholesale
market
Required PV tariff based on
investors’ profitability
requirements
CLP /
kWh
Generation
Parity
Simplistic Illustration of PV Generation Parity
DEFINITIONS & METHODOLOGYUTILITY-SCALE
Platinum sponsors:
requirements
Years
• Electricity from wholesale markets
is cheaper than PV-generated
electricity
- PV sponsors will need support
mechanisms (FiT, tax credit,
etc.) in order to invest in PV
energy
• PV-generated electricity is cheaper
than electricity from wholesale
markets
- Wholesale prices are such that
the IPP would achieve at least
the minimum profitability sought
in order to build the PV plant
12
Source: ECLAREON
13. The required tariff is calculated as the theoretical rate with
which the PV investor would achieve at least the minimum
profitability sought in order to build the PV plant
Economics (cash flows) of a utility-scale PV plant • As real market data for the initial
investment, operating expenses and
debt costs of the PV plant are available,
the only remaining data necessary to
complete the economics of the project
is income
- Actual electricity production of the PV
plant can be accurately modeled, so the
Years
Equity cash flow (ECF)
CLP
DEFINITIONS & METHODOLOGYUTILITY-SCALE
Platinum sponsors:
13
plant can be accurately modeled, so the
only “X” of our equation is the required
tariff (Eur/kWh) which will be applied to
electricity production
• When investing in a merchant plant, PV
investors will ask for an IRR at least
equal to the specific cost of equity of
that kind of project and country
- The required tariff will be the one that
gives the minimum IRR required by the
investor
Income1
Equity
Debt service
O&M costs
IRR ECF = Cost of equity
Taxes
Notes: 1 Only considering energy sales
Source: CREARA analysis
14. It is necessary to determine a reference price that will serve as a
benchmark of the potential income that a PV IPP could obtain from
the market in each considered country
• In order to determine if the analyzed market
presents generation parity, the following market
prices can be considered as a good reference:
- Marginal prices of the day-ahead market in a power
exchange
- Price of PPA contracts that are negotiated freely in
a liberalized market
CAGR
2009 – 2014
100.000
120.000
140.000
7.2%
Evolution of average nodal prices per semester in Diego de
Almagro node (CDEC-SIC, Chile)
6.4%
DEFINITIONS & METHODOLOGYUTILITY-SCALE
Platinum sponsors:
14
• As PPA prices are not always easy to obtain (no
public information is available), the GPM report
selects between these two alternatives as a
practical simplification:
- A marginal price, where possible
- A regulated tariff for large consumers
- In countries where no spot market exists, it
has been selected this option as a theoretical
upper boundary of a PPA contract (working
hypothesis)
Source: ECLAREON
CLP/
MWh
0
20.000
40.000
60.000
80.000
2009S1
2009S2
2010S1
2010S2
2011S1
2011S2
2012S1
2012S2
2013S1
2013S2
2014S1
6.4%
Average price
Average price for
dayligh hours
15. PV Grid Parity has already been reached in the residential
segment, albeit to different extents in different locations of Chile
CLP/
kWh
Standard Tariff
Surcharge tariff (Winter)
Grid tariffs
PV LCOE (avg.) -19.3%
-9.3%
-8.1%
Past evolution of grid electricity price and PV LCOE
(SANTIAGO)
• Full Grid Parity has been reached
in Northern Chile, while in other
locations with lower irradiation
only partial grid parity has been
reached
- In Santiago, Grid Parity is only
partial since PV LCOE is only
competitive with the rate
CAGR*
S1'09-S1'14
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
RESULTSRESIDENTIAL
Platinum sponsors:
CLP/
kWh
Standard Tariff
Surcharge tariff (Winter)
Grid tariffs
PV LCOE (avg.) -19.3%
-6.7%
-5.5%
Past evolution of grid electricity price and PV LCOE
(COPIAPÓ)
competitive with the rate
applicable to excess
consumption in winter
• As the small-scale PV market is
relatively immature in Chile, it is
possible to find a margin for price
reduction. This fact might help to
move this segment toward full
grid parity
Note: * Compound Annual Growth Rate
Source: CREARA analysis
15
CAGR*
S1'09-S1'14
2009S1 2010S1 2011S1 2012S1 2013S1 2014S1
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
2009S1 2010S1 2011S1 2012S1 2013S1 2014S1
16. Despite high irradiation levels in Copiapó, a relatively low variable
component of the electricity tariff impedes Grid Parity
Past evolution of grid electricity price and PV LCOE
(COPIAPÓ)
• Even with existing high
irradiation levels, the PV
technology is not competitive
against electricity prices for
commercial consumers
• The main factors impeding Grid
Parity are the following:
CAGR
S2'12-S1'14
CLP/
RESULTSCOMMERCIAL
100
120
140
160
Platinum sponsors:
Parity are the following:
- Low variable electricity
prices for the commercial
segment
- High PV installation prices
- A relatively high discount
rate, which reflects the
return required by equity and
debt holders
Source: ECLAREON analysis
16
PV LCOE (avg.) -17.2%
-13.0%Standard tariff
CLP/
kWh
0
20
40
60
80
2012S2 2013S1 2013S2 2014S1
17. Reference prices are clearly above the required tariff for a PV
investor, which implies that full generation parity exists in
Chile for a large PV producer
Comparison of hourly marginal cost of spot market and the required
tariff for a PV investor in Chile under a project finance structure
(Diego de Almagro)
• Both high electricity rates
and extraordinary irradiation
levels contribute to the full
generation parity in this
Chilean region
• Although SIC market has
presented high volatility rates
100.000
120.000
Reference price
CAGR
S2'12-S1'14
1.0%
RESULTSUTILITY-SCALE
Platinum sponsors:
presented high volatility rates
in the past decade, PV tariff
offers a wide margin to
absorb potential decreases in
the spot market
- It represents less than 50%
of current spot market prices
- It is necessary to go back to
2009 to find spot prices
below the current required
tariff
17
0
20.000
40.000
60.000
80.000
2012S2
2013S1
2013S2
2014S1
CLP/
MWh
1.6%Required tariff
Source: ECLAREON analysis
18. CONCLUSIONS
Main conclusions
• According to the study, in the first semester of 2014 the cost of PV generation as expressed by the
LCOE (Levelized Cost of Electricity) decreased in both residential and commercial segments
- Residential LCOE decreased 19% annually from 2009 to 2014, reaching complete grid parity in
Copiapó and partial parity in Santiago
- Despite an annual decline of 17% in the commercial LCOE, grid parity does not exist in the
commercial segment mainly due to a relatively low variable component of the electricity tariff
• The results of the GPM analysis also show that full generation parity exists in Chile for a large PV
producer
Platinum sponsors:
producer
- However, given the volatility in wholesale markets, the fast decline of PV prices (much higher in the utility
segment than in residential or commercial segment), and ongoing regulatory reforms, PV utility-scale
competitiveness should be recurrently monitored over time
• Despite the fact that PV competitiveness has not been reached in some segments, this is not an
impediment for a future PV market development in Chile
- The motivation of PV developers can vary from many factors, including environmental needs, green
certificate requirements or long-term energy security, could contribute to a major technology
development
Source: CREARA
18
19. The GPM is a Series of analyses that show the evolution of PV
competitiveness in different consumer segments: residential,
commercial, and utility-scale
Do you want more information about the GPM?
Send us an email
OVERVIEW of GPM reports
October‘12 May‘13 Feb’ 2015
March’14 May’15
Aug ’14 July’15
1ST ISSUE 2ND ISSUE 3RD ISSUE
RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL
UTILITY SCALE
Platinum sponsors:
19
Available @
http://www.leonardo-energy.org/
BE THE NEXT SPONSOR OF THE GPM
Contact us:
Davide Sabatino
dsa@creara.es
+34 913 950 154
April’15CHILE
May’15MEXICO